2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.71.051101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying signals with power-law correlations: A comparative study of detrended fluctuation analysis and detrended moving average techniques

Abstract: Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) and detrended moving average (DMA) are two scaling analysis methods designed to quantify correlations in noisy non-stationary signals. We systematically study the performance of different variants of the DMA method when applied to artificially generated long-range power-law correlated signals with an a-priori known scaling exponent α0 and compare them with the DFA method. We find that the scaling results obtained from different variants of the DMA method strongly depend on … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
185
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
185
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with traditional correlation analyses such as power spectral analysis and Hurst analysis, the DFA can accurately quantify correlations in signals that may be masked by underlying nonstationarities or trends (Hu et al, 2001;Chen et al, 2002;Xu et al, 2005). We used DFA to quantify the detrended fluctuations F(n) of activity at different time scales n. For each chosen time scale n, the DFA method involves the following steps (Peng et al, 1994): i) integrating the time series; ii) dividing the integrated time series into non-overlapped bins of equal size n (the chosen time scale); iii) in each bin, fitting the integrated time series with a second order polynomial function, which defines 'local' trends assumed to be the result of external influences.…”
Section: (I) Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with traditional correlation analyses such as power spectral analysis and Hurst analysis, the DFA can accurately quantify correlations in signals that may be masked by underlying nonstationarities or trends (Hu et al, 2001;Chen et al, 2002;Xu et al, 2005). We used DFA to quantify the detrended fluctuations F(n) of activity at different time scales n. For each chosen time scale n, the DFA method involves the following steps (Peng et al, 1994): i) integrating the time series; ii) dividing the integrated time series into non-overlapped bins of equal size n (the chosen time scale); iii) in each bin, fitting the integrated time series with a second order polynomial function, which defines 'local' trends assumed to be the result of external influences.…”
Section: (I) Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2)) at the boundaries of the segments, since the fitting polynomials in neighboring segments are not related. As a simple way to avoid these jumps the central moving average (CMA) method was suggested recently [19] (see also [20], where this method is compared with the backward moving average technique). In CMA, Eq.…”
Section: Central Moving Average (Cma) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For recent comparative studies not focused on detrending methods, see [14,17,18]. For studies comparing DFA and BMA, see [46,47]; note that [47] also discusses CMA. For studies comparing methods for detrending multifractal analysis (multifractal DFA (MF-DFA) and wavelet transform modulus maxima (WTMM) method), see [5,24,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%