Treatise on Geomorphology 2022
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818234-5.00161-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Sediment (Dis)Connectivity in the Modeling of River Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 169 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…River networks are vulnerable to loss of connectivity, given they are (1) dynamic (e.g., flow varies through space and time), (2) organized into bifurcating networks, which have little to no redundancy in dispersal pathways between patches, and (3) frequently the target of anthropogenic alterations (Brierley et al, 2021; Grill et al, 2019). In river systems, spatial connectivity is largely determined by network topology and the presence and position of barriers (e.g., dams and culverts), whereas temporal connectivity is largely driven by changes in flow (e.g., drying events).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River networks are vulnerable to loss of connectivity, given they are (1) dynamic (e.g., flow varies through space and time), (2) organized into bifurcating networks, which have little to no redundancy in dispersal pathways between patches, and (3) frequently the target of anthropogenic alterations (Brierley et al, 2021; Grill et al, 2019). In river systems, spatial connectivity is largely determined by network topology and the presence and position of barriers (e.g., dams and culverts), whereas temporal connectivity is largely driven by changes in flow (e.g., drying events).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%