2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2014
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2014.6944931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying saccades while walking: Validity of a novel velocity-based algorithm for mobile eye tracking

Abstract: We validate a novel algorithm to detect saccades from raw data obtained during walking from a mobile infra-red eye-tracking device. The algorithm was based on a velocity threshold detection method, which excluded artefacts such as blinks and flickers using specific criteria. Mobile infra-red eye-tracking was performed with a group of healthy older adults (n=5) and Parkinson's disease (n=5) subjects. Saccades determined from raw eye tracker data obtained during walking using the algorithm were compared to a gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, static seated eye-movement assessments tended to comprehensively report many outcomes from long testing protocols, whereas dynamic standing or walking tasks tended to report a small number of largely saccadic outcomes (e.g., saccade number, velocity, amplitude; Murray et al, 2014Murray et al, , 2017Stuart et al, 2019b). This task-dependent reporting of eye-movement outcomes likely stems from the complexity of data processing and analysis with increasingly dynamic tasks (Zhu and Ji, 2005;Stuart et al, 2014bStuart et al, , 2019a. Unlike controlled static seated assessments, dynamic tasks introduce other factors (e.g., head movement, vestibular-ocular reflexes, lighting conditions of testing) that can impact recordings and need to be controlled for as these factors have been demonstrated to influence eye-tracking outcomes (Stuart et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, static seated eye-movement assessments tended to comprehensively report many outcomes from long testing protocols, whereas dynamic standing or walking tasks tended to report a small number of largely saccadic outcomes (e.g., saccade number, velocity, amplitude; Murray et al, 2014Murray et al, , 2017Stuart et al, 2019b). This task-dependent reporting of eye-movement outcomes likely stems from the complexity of data processing and analysis with increasingly dynamic tasks (Zhu and Ji, 2005;Stuart et al, 2014bStuart et al, , 2019a. Unlike controlled static seated assessments, dynamic tasks introduce other factors (e.g., head movement, vestibular-ocular reflexes, lighting conditions of testing) that can impact recordings and need to be controlled for as these factors have been demonstrated to influence eye-tracking outcomes (Stuart et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary behavioural outcome of this study was saccade frequency (number of saccades per second) during gait, obtained from the raw mobile eye‐tracker data (Fig. C) using a previously validated algorithm (Stuart et al ., ). Only saccades with ≥ 5° amplitude (≥ 240°/s) were analysed to account for vestibular‐ocular reflex or micro‐saccade data intrusion (Galna et al ., ; Stuart et al ., ), and a maximal velocity threshold of ≥ 1000°/s was used to rule out flickers or other spurious movements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…C) using a previously validated algorithm (Stuart et al ., ). Only saccades with ≥ 5° amplitude (≥ 240°/s) were analysed to account for vestibular‐ocular reflex or micro‐saccade data intrusion (Galna et al ., ; Stuart et al ., ), and a maximal velocity threshold of ≥ 1000°/s was used to rule out flickers or other spurious movements. Saccade frequency was calculated as the number of saccades made within a walk divided by the duration of the walk, which controlled for the different walking speeds between participants in the same manner as previous research (Galna et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Video Inspection: Videos were analysed similar to previous work [14]. All IR videos (eye/fieldcamera) for each participant (n=20) during static and dynamic trials were visually inspected by a single examiner (AH) frame-by-frame, in order to compare algorithm results (180 videos in total).…”
Section: Feature Selection and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%