2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-008-9153-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Relationships Among Phosphorus, Agriculture, and Lake Depth at an Inter-Regional Scale

Abstract: To date, studies examining the impact of agriculture on freshwater systems have been spatially confined (that is, single drainage basin or regional level). Across regions, there are considerable differences in a number of factors, including geology, catchment morphometry, and hydrology that affect water quality. Given this heterogeneity, it is unknown whether agricultural activities have a pervasive impact on lake trophic state across large spatial scales. To address this issue, we tested whether the proportio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
67
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many other studies have also shown increases in TP in lakes related to the intensity of agricultural cultivation (Umbanhowar 2003, Jones et al 2004, Taranu and Gregory-Eaves 2008 and determinations of higher phosphorus exports with agricultural land as opposed to forested land (Endreny and Wood 2003).…”
Section: Lakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other studies have also shown increases in TP in lakes related to the intensity of agricultural cultivation (Umbanhowar 2003, Jones et al 2004, Taranu and Gregory-Eaves 2008 and determinations of higher phosphorus exports with agricultural land as opposed to forested land (Endreny and Wood 2003).…”
Section: Lakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of our understanding regarding the interactions between changes in land cover/use, climate, and lake eutrophication comes from detailed studies of individual lakes (5), modeling exercises (1), and/or regional-scale syntheses of instrumental data (6,7); these studies are largely based on relatively short time series (8). Depending on the multitudinous local differences in catchment and lake morphology, river transport capacity, climate, geology, and regional trajectories in socioeconomic development, the responses of lakes to surrounding land changes can differ greatly in intensity, modalities, and kinetics (9)(10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecoregions have been used to partition water quality at the national scale (Paulsen et al 2008, USEPA 2009, Griffith 2014; however, an understanding of the specific biogeochemical processes classified by ecoregions is lacking. Large-scale studies show that lakespecific characteristics (e.g., depth), watershed-scale land use and land cover, and surface and groundwater connectivity are important for predicting water quality (e.g., Kratz et al 1997, Martin and Soranno 2006, Wagner et al 2007, Bremigan et al 2008, Taranu and Gregory-Eaves 2008, Nielsen et al 2012, Zhang et al 2012, Cheruvelil et al 2013); these drivers can vary both within and among ecoregions. To some extent, national policy takes into account cross-scale interactions among these multi-scaled drivers by using regional variation in water quality to set nutrient criteria recommendations (USEPA 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%