2015
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying randomness in real networks

Abstract: Represented as graphs, real networks are intricate combinations of order and disorder. Fixing some of the structural properties of network models to their values observed in real networks, many other properties appear as statistical consequences of these fixed observables, plus randomness in other respects. Here we employ the dk-series, a complete set of basic characteristics of the network structure, to study the statistical dependencies between different network properties. We consider six real networks—the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
191
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
191
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, low-order correlations ( = 2 − 2.5) are sufficient to capture all significant network properties in real world networks. This work has been published recently in the journal Nature Communications [24].…”
Section: The Case For More General Constraints: How Random Are Complementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Usually, low-order correlations ( = 2 − 2.5) are sufficient to capture all significant network properties in real world networks. This work has been published recently in the journal Nature Communications [24].…”
Section: The Case For More General Constraints: How Random Are Complementioning
confidence: 98%
“…If we impose a network to satisfy some specific properties (i.e., some features), the corresponding RNM complexity is affected by such restrictions [29][30][31]. In [29,30], the concept of network ensembles is proposed, based on a statistical mechanics approach, to characterize random networks.…”
Section: Successive Approximation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the values for the network-level metrics is attributed to the sociological structure and influence among nodes not being captured in the random networks even though they are modeled to have an identical degree sequence to that of the social networks [48]. The authors in [49] conclude that global network-level metrics cannot be expected to be even closely reproduced in random network graphs generated with local constraints (such as the degree-preserving randomization). To corroborate this statement, degreepreserved randomized versions of the Internet at the level of ASs (AS -Autonomous Systems) are observed to have a fewer number of k-shells [50].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%