2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying particulate matter deposition in Niwot Ridge, Colorado: Collection of dry deposition using marble inserts and particle imaging using the FlowCAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marble inserts were then sealed with a leak‐resistant Sterilite® lid, placed into a plastic bag, transported within a few hours to the laboratory, and stored at 4°C until processing. Goss et al () demonstrated that processing of the marble insert did not result in measurable losses of particulate matter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marble inserts were then sealed with a leak‐resistant Sterilite® lid, placed into a plastic bag, transported within a few hours to the laboratory, and stored at 4°C until processing. Goss et al () demonstrated that processing of the marble insert did not result in measurable losses of particulate matter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate a platform technology to utilize natural pollen grains as a drug delivery vehicle, the grains have been characterized methodically to assess uniformity in size, morphology, and physical changes arising during the course of the encapsulation process. In order to characterize natural pollen grains we employed dynamic imaging particle analysis (DIPA) (see the Supporting Information). Figure A shows representative data by curve fitting histograms of equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) versus frequency with an average ESD of 37.93 ± 1.41 μm for natural pollen grains and an ESD of 36.54 ± 1.45 μm, 36.95 ± 1.35 μm, and 36.17 ± 1.36 μm, respectively, for passive, compression, and vacuum‐loaded pollen grains.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of surrogate surface is one approach to directly measure dry deposition (Odabassi et al 2002). Goss et al (2013) developed and tested a marble insert for dry deposition collection. Then, they developed a method for enumerating the collected dry deposition with the flow Cytometer and Microscope (FlowCAM), a dynamic image particle analysis tool.…”
Section: Discussion On Various Methods Of Flux Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%