2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying nutrient recovery by element flow analysis: Harvest and use of seven marine biomasses to close N and P loops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that nutrient levels of shore water can be strongly correlated with beach wrack biomass, suggesting a direct export of nutrients from decomposing wrack (Dugan et al 2011). Although nutrient leaking was not studied in the present study, beach wrack from the region of the present study has been reported to contain an average of 19 kg N and 2 kg P for every ton of wrack (Sinha et al 2022), so if the Tja ¨lderviken site alone contains * 500 tons of beach wrack, it would mean that cleaning the beach from this amount of wrack could prevent around 9500 kg N and 1000 kg P to reach the coastal water. This would be a considerable advantage as the Baltic waters are already eutrophic (Murray et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It has been shown that nutrient levels of shore water can be strongly correlated with beach wrack biomass, suggesting a direct export of nutrients from decomposing wrack (Dugan et al 2011). Although nutrient leaking was not studied in the present study, beach wrack from the region of the present study has been reported to contain an average of 19 kg N and 2 kg P for every ton of wrack (Sinha et al 2022), so if the Tja ¨lderviken site alone contains * 500 tons of beach wrack, it would mean that cleaning the beach from this amount of wrack could prevent around 9500 kg N and 1000 kg P to reach the coastal water. This would be a considerable advantage as the Baltic waters are already eutrophic (Murray et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Also, Saraiva et al in 2019 predicted an intensification of eutrophication in the Baltic Sea by the end of the 21st century, under the auspices of climate warming and high nutrient loads [25]. In the work by Sinha et al [26], the social decisions about climate change mitigation, which will dramatically impact eutrophication in the 21st century, were analyzed. They examined the impact of changes in land use and land management and concluded that excessive nitrogen runoff will greatly affect the global ecosystem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-trophic species thus also may hold the key to mitigating eutrophication, at least at a local level. Depending on the use of the biomass, for example for long-lived biomaterials or as a fertilizer, the CO 2 may be captured for a longer period of time and also work as a temporary carbon sink [8]. Furthermore, studies of large seaweed cultivation in Sweden have also shown a positive effect on biodiversity in and around the cultivation sites [9], so regular inspections could help to document local environmental change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%