2013
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201300146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying molecular colocalization in live cell fluorescence microscopy

Abstract: One of the most challenging tasks in microscopy is the quantitative identification and characterization of molecular interactions. In living cells this task is typically performed by fluorescent labeling of the interaction partners with spectrally distinct fluorophores and imaging in different color channels. Current methods for determining colocalization of molecules result in outcomes that can vary greatly depending on signal‐to‐noise ratios, threshold and background levels, or differences in intensity betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these favorable fluorescence properties, the subcellular localization of Ir2 and Ir5 in A549 cells was detected using confocal microscopy. Lyso Tracker Red DND-99 (LTDR) and Mito Tracker ® Red CM-H2XRos (MTDR) were used as lysosomal and mitochondrial fluorescent probe, respectively ( Humpert et al, 2015 ; Raha et al, 2020 ). As shown in Figure 4 , lysosomes were the main target sites of complexes after 1 h of incubation, and Pearson’s colocalization coefficient (PCC) for Ir2 and Ir5 were 0.69 and 0.76, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these favorable fluorescence properties, the subcellular localization of Ir2 and Ir5 in A549 cells was detected using confocal microscopy. Lyso Tracker Red DND-99 (LTDR) and Mito Tracker ® Red CM-H2XRos (MTDR) were used as lysosomal and mitochondrial fluorescent probe, respectively ( Humpert et al, 2015 ; Raha et al, 2020 ). As shown in Figure 4 , lysosomes were the main target sites of complexes after 1 h of incubation, and Pearson’s colocalization coefficient (PCC) for Ir2 and Ir5 were 0.69 and 0.76, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying them to multi-color images is not an obvious task: Particle arrangements with more than two different particle types can occur in different config-urations (Figure 1B), and depending on the biological context, some may be of interest and others may simply not exist in the imaged sample. A geometry-uninformed, pairwise analysis of all possible channel combinations (Smallcombe, 2001), as well as the few established methods that are explicitly presented as multi-color pixel-based (Sastre et al, 2019; Goucher et al, 2005; Humpert et al, 2015; Fletcher et al, 2010) and object-based (Haas and Peau-celle, 2021; Lagache et al, 2018; Vega-Lugo et al, 2022) colocalization tools are prone to overestimate colocalization, as soon as the biological complex of interest has a fixed geometry and stoichiometry, as we can show in a simula-tion study (Figure 2A). To exploit the full potential of multi-color microscopy imaging in such a situation, it is therefore beneficial to actively incorporate prior knowledge of the local geometry into the colocalization analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative concept has been followed by Costes et al, who developed a method for automated and unbiased threshold determination 6, solving some of the issues that occur with the method of Manders et al, as the latter is quite sensitive to background, which has to be subtracted manually 4. A number of elegant review articles discuss theory and practice of colocalization analysis and explain the different parameters in more detail 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. Many of the different methods have been incorporated in various commercial image analysis programs, but also as plugins into powerful free software such as ImageJ from the National Institute of Health, USA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%