2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Water Heaters

Abstract: Methane emissions from natural gas appliances remain the least characterized portion of the fossil-fuel supply chain. Here we examine water heaters from 64 northern California homes to (1) quantify methane emissions from natural gas leaks and incomplete combustion while off, turning on or off, and in steady-state operation from 35 homes; and (2) characterize daily usage patterns over ∼1−2 months per water heater to estimate activity factors from 46 homes. Individual tankless water heaters emitted 2390 [95% CI:… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The footprints were convolved with a 1-km resolution prior model of anthropogenic and biogenic CH 4 emissions previously described by McKain et al ( 4 ), which was augmented with updated landfill and NG point source fluxes ( 17 – 19 ), residential ( 20 22 ) and commercial ( 23 ) building losses, and seasonally varying wetland emissions ( 24 ) ( SI Appendix , section S2 ). The inventory also included newly reported pipeline losses from Weller et al ( 25 ), who assessed pipeline leaks with methane analyzers driven through four cities, covering ∼10,000 km of pipelines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The footprints were convolved with a 1-km resolution prior model of anthropogenic and biogenic CH 4 emissions previously described by McKain et al ( 4 ), which was augmented with updated landfill and NG point source fluxes ( 17 – 19 ), residential ( 20 22 ) and commercial ( 23 ) building losses, and seasonally varying wetland emissions ( 24 ) ( SI Appendix , section S2 ). The inventory also included newly reported pipeline losses from Weller et al ( 25 ), who assessed pipeline leaks with methane analyzers driven through four cities, covering ∼10,000 km of pipelines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the GGL, FlexFoil SKC bag samples were each analyzed for methane mole fractions and δ 13 C. Methane mole fractions were determined using a Picarro G1301 CRDS, which measured every 5 s for 2 min, resulting in a precision ±0.3 ppb (Lowry et al, 2020;France et al, 2016;Zazzeri et al, 2015). Each sample was then measured for stable isotopes (δ 13 C-CH 4 ) using an Elementar Trace gas and continuous-flow gas chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometry (CF-GC-IRMS) system (Fisher et al, 2006), which has an average repeatability of ±0.05 ‰.…”
Section: Lab Isotopic Analysis Of δ 13 C and δDmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each sample was measured three times for δ 13 C-CH 4 , and the duration of each analysis was ≈ 20 min. Both instruments are calibrated weekly to the WMO X2004A methane scale using air-filled cylinders that were measured by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and cylinders that were calibrated against the NOAA scale by the MPI-BGC (France et al, 2016;Lowry et al, 2020).…”
Section: Lab Isotopic Analysis Of δ 13 C and δDmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 and residential or commercial consumption of NG (Table2). NG exhaust from diverse residential implements (for heating, water heating, and cooking) contains some unburned CH 4 due to inevitable incomplete combustion(Lebel et al 2020;Merrin and Francisco 2019) Helfter et al (2016). suggest that in winter, increases in CH 4 concentrations above the background level could be attributed to CH 4 losses from over-pressurized pipelines as a response to an increase in gas demand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%