Quantifying Learning: Measuring Student Outcomes in Higher Education in England

Abstract

Since 2014, the government in England has undertaken a programme of work to explore the measurement of learning gain in undergraduate education. This is part of a wider neoliberal agenda to create a market in higher education, with student outcomes featuring as a key construct of value for money. The Higher Education Funding Council for England (subsequently dismantled) invested £4 million in funding 13 pilot projects to develop and test instruments and methods for measuring learning gain, with approaches largely borrowed from the US. Whilst measures with validity in specific disciplinary or institutional contexts were developed, a robust single instrument or measure has failed to emerge. The attempt to quantify learning represented by this initiative should spark debate about the rationale for quantification—whether it is for accountability, measuring performance, assuring quality or for the enhancement of teaching, learning and the student experience. It also raises profound questions about who defines the purpose of higher education; and whether it is those inside or outside of the academy who have the authority to decide the key learning outcomes of higher education. This article argues that in focusing on the largely technical aspects of the quantification of learning, government-funded attempts in England to measure learning gain have overlooked fundamental questions about the aims and values of higher education. Moreover, this search for a measure of learning gain represents the attempt to use quantification to legitimize the authority to define quality and appropriate outcomes in higher education.

Datafying Museum Visitors: A Research Agenda

“…45 At the same time, educators are datafying learning by measuring points of attention, using eye-tracking to measure views, and quantifying information retention. 46 New data collection opportunities such as radio signal technologies (e.g., iBeacon, WIFI, or ultra-wideband anchors) can be used to position visitors in a museum space or gallery with increasing precision, creating heatmaps of attention and visitor activity. 47 Such methods support attempts to quantify visitor movement and learning.…”

Student Engagement Amongst Regional Australian Undergraduate Students

“…Traditionally, student satisfaction has been prioritised by education providers attempting to quantify student success; however, there have been calls for a more detailed perspective of the student experience that considers who and what students are becoming (Bowden et al, 2019). Hence while many universities have attempted to improve student engagement by implementing policies aimed at the teaching staff, the degree to which this has been effective in improving student engagement on the ground should be quantified through methods such as student evaluation and feedback surveys (Kandiko Howson and Buckley, 2020;Mandal, 2018). In this way, educators also have an opportunity to respond with their experiences.…”

Factors Affecting University Choice Behaviour in the UK Higher Education

“…Howson and Buckley provide a history of quantitative measures from the students' success [11], yet the added value of such measures for various stakeholders is unclear. Performance data as presented, rankings, and reviews all serve greater importance to institutes than to applicants.…”