2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022gc010682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Inclination Shallowing and Representing Flattening Uncertainty in Sedimentary Paleomagnetic Poles

Abstract: Hematite-bearing sedimentary rocks at Earth's surface are widespread and serve as an important paleomagnetic recorder. The geocentric axial dipole hypothesis posits that the long-term average of Earth's magnetic field is dipolar and that the time-averaged geomagnetic pole overlaps with the geographic pole. Using this hypothesis, the inclination (I) of a rock's magnetization can be translated into an interpreted paleolatitude (ϕ) of the location where the rock formed using the dipole formula:Unfortunately, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean pole position of the Kent distribution was calculated following the method of Pierce et al. (2022). The close proximity between Jacobsville poles with the Chequamegon pole is consistent with their deposition being coeval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean pole position of the Kent distribution was calculated following the method of Pierce et al. (2022). The close proximity between Jacobsville poles with the Chequamegon pole is consistent with their deposition being coeval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This uncertainty results in more uncertainty associated with paleolatitude which for the pole is along the great circle path between the mean pole position and the locality of the Jacobsville sections. Following Pierce et al (2022), the pole can be represented with a Kent distribution 95% confidence ellipse which is: mean longitude = 183.4°E, mean latitude = 16.9°S, major axis longitude = 255.5°E, major axis latitude = 45.2°N, major axis confidence angle = 4.1°, minor axis longitude = 108.1°E, minor axis latitude = 39.9°N, minor axis confidence angle = 3.1°(Figure 7; Table 1). This pole position is close to the end of the Keweenawan Track (Figure 8) and far away from Laurentia's pole positions during the Paleozoic when there was orogenesis along Laurentia's eastern margin (Figure S7 in Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Averaging Paleosecular Variation and Correcting For Inclinat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following theoretical expectations of a time‐averaged field, we use Fisher statistics to estimate a measure of centrality, and through repeated calculations we build empirical distribution functions whose shapes can be monitored. This flexibility also provides a more robust way to incorporate uncertainties that otherwise require the adoption of alternative parametric models (e.g., Pierce et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the global APWP of Vaes et al (2023), we only used sediment-derived paleopoles that were corrected for inclination shallowing using the elongation-inclination (E/I) correction of Tauxe and Kent (2004) and that satisfied the criteria proposed by Vaes et al (2021). This avoided the variable bias posed by potential inclination shallowing and allows propagating the uncertainty associated with the E/I correction in the calculation of the APWP (following the approach of Pierce et al (2022); see section 3 in Vaes et al (2023) for more details). The input file thus includes an optional column for the uncertainty of the E/I correction.…”
Section: Input and Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%