2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Impurity Effects on the Surface Morphology of α-U3O8

Abstract: The morphological effect of impurities on α-U3O8 has been investigated. This study provides the first evidence that the presence of impurities can alter nuclear material morphology, and these changes can be quantified to aid in revealing processing history. Four elements: Ca, Mg, V, and Zr were implemented in the uranyl peroxide synthesis route and studied individually within the α-U3O8. Six total replicates were synthesized, and replicates 1–3 were filtered and washed with Millipore water (18.2 MΩ) to remove … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building significantly on this potential, several recent studies investigated the morphology of various UOCs using a software program, morphological analysis for materials ( MAMA ), to quantitatively characterize the particles from SEM images. , Olsen et al studied the differences in the morphological features of U 3 O 8 materials produced by calcining α-UO 3 at various temperatures, 600, 650, 700, 750, and 800 °C . While they did observe some qualitative variations among the U 3 O 8 samples produced at the various calcining temperatures, processing the SEM images through the MAMA particle segmentation software enabled a quantitative determination of the morphological statistics for the material.…”
Section: Uocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Building significantly on this potential, several recent studies investigated the morphology of various UOCs using a software program, morphological analysis for materials ( MAMA ), to quantitatively characterize the particles from SEM images. , Olsen et al studied the differences in the morphological features of U 3 O 8 materials produced by calcining α-UO 3 at various temperatures, 600, 650, 700, 750, and 800 °C . While they did observe some qualitative variations among the U 3 O 8 samples produced at the various calcining temperatures, processing the SEM images through the MAMA particle segmentation software enabled a quantitative determination of the morphological statistics for the material.…”
Section: Uocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, recent research has examined the morphology of various uranium oxides, with a focus on discerning process history or process conditions for a particular sample of material. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]46 One outcome of these efforts was a lexicon to standardize descriptions of material images for nuclear forensics, indicating a likely increasing role for morphology within nuclear forensics. 33 Recent research has also investigated elemental and chemical impurities present in process samples of uranium compounds, also with a focus of discerning process history as well as the origin of the uranium.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 The storage of uranium oxides impacts their surface morphology and methods to link surface morphology to the processing history and storage have been reported. 18,19 The oxidation and hydration of U 3 O 8 can lead to the formation of schoepite phases, thus with time and exposure to moisture, the phase assemblage of a UOC will evolve. 8,20 Schoepite is assumed to easily transition to meta-schoepite under ambient conditions and it has also been shown that metaschoepite can form on the surface of U 3 O 8 when exposed to air and moisture.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matson et al (2019) utilized CNNs to categorize structures of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers. Similarly, Hanson et al (2019) and Heffernan et al (2019) also used CNNs for the task of categorizing the characteristics of materials. In addition to using CNNs for the task of classification, CNNs have also been deployed for other tasks such as estimating optimal operational parameters (such as the focus setting) during the image acquisition of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (Yang et al, 2020), segmenting structures characterized in SEM images (Ly et al, 2019;Pazdernik et al, 2020), denoising the drifted microscopic images (Vasudevan & Jesse, 2019), and reconstructing sparse SEM images (Trampert et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%