2011
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying hemodynamic refractory bold effects in normal subjects at the single‐subject level using an inverse logit fitting procedure

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate whether hemodynamic refractory effects provoked by repeated visual stimulation can be detected and quantified at the single-subject level using a recently described hemodynamic response function (HRF) fitting algorithm. Materials and Methods:Hemodynamic refractory effects were induced with an easily applicable functional MRI (fMRI) paradigm. A fitting method with inverse logit (IL) functions was applied to quantify net HRFs at the singlesubject level with three interstimulus intervals (ISI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the three timing indices, TTH showed the smallest variance (Table 1). Therefore, analogous to several previous studies (Descamps et al, 2012; Liu et al, 2005; Waugh et al, 2008; Weilke et al, 2001) and consistent with our prediction that TTH may offer more robust estimates than Onset and TTP , TTH was considered the most reliable measure of HDR latency (results for Onset and TTP are, however, reported as well; see Tables 1 and 2). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Among the three timing indices, TTH showed the smallest variance (Table 1). Therefore, analogous to several previous studies (Descamps et al, 2012; Liu et al, 2005; Waugh et al, 2008; Weilke et al, 2001) and consistent with our prediction that TTH may offer more robust estimates than Onset and TTP , TTH was considered the most reliable measure of HDR latency (results for Onset and TTP are, however, reported as well; see Tables 1 and 2). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…181]. In some cases, the basis functions contain additional unknown parameters, such as the inverse logit model, which consists of the superposition of three inverse logit functions [Descamps et al, 2012;Lindquist and Wager, 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%