Quantifying Geometric Accuracy With Unsupervised Machine Learning: Using Self-Organizing Map on Fused Filament Fabrication Additive Manufacturing Parts

Abstract

Although complex geometries are attainable with additive manufacturing (AM), a major barrier preventing its use in mission-critical applications is the lack of geometric accuracy of AM parts. Existing geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) characteristics are defined based on simple landmark features, and thus, need to be customized to capture the subtle difference in parts with complex geometries. Hence, the objective of this work is to quantify the geometric deviations of additively manufactured parts from a large data set of laser-scanned coordinates using an unsupervised machine learning (ML) approach called the self-organizing map (SOM). The central hypothesis is that clusters recognized by the SOM correspond to specific types of geometric deviations, which in turn are linked to certain AM process conditions. This hypothesis is tested on parts made while varying process conditions in the fused filament fabrication (FFF) AM process. The outcomes of this research are as follows: (1) visualizing and quantifying the link between process conditions and geometric accuracy in FFF and (2) significantly reducing the amount of point cloud data required for characterizing of geometric accuracy. The significance of this research is that this unsupervised ML approach resulted in less than 3% of over 1 million data points being required to fully quantify the part geometric accuracy.

Machines as Craftsmen: Localized Parameter Setting Optimization for Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing

“…[5] Machine learning has been successfully applied in applications such as image processing, text classification, and speech recognition. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] An example of the utility of machine learning in the established quality control method of visual inspection is demonstrated by the use of a neural network to identify flaws in laser powder bed fusion 3D printing. [8] Examples of their use in both monitoring/feedback applications and predictive models include predicting property outcomes based on parameter settings, predicting global parameter settings for specific outcomes, identifying failures during printing, predicting bead geometry, adjusting geometry to prevent failures, and assessing part manufacturability.…”

Machine Learning in Additive Manufacturing: A Review

“…It should be noted that the same dataset in Ref. [63] is also used in Ref. [45] for quality assessment using supervised learning.…”

A Perspective on Using Machine Learning in 3D Bioprinting

“…Similarly, Khanzadeh et al . [ 23 ] proposed an unsupervised machine learning approach (self-organizing map) to quantify the geometric deviations of additively manufactured parts in fused filament fabrication processes. In addition, Zhu et al .…”