2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00057-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying filamentous microorganisms in activated sludge before, during, and after an incident of foaming by oligonucleotide probe hybridizations and antibody staining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each site tested, foam potential increased with TSS ( Figure 4). The relationship in each case was found to be nonlinear, confirming similar observations [51]. For routine plant monitoring this test should be performed at the operational MLSS.…”
Section: Influence Of Mlss Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For each site tested, foam potential increased with TSS ( Figure 4). The relationship in each case was found to be nonlinear, confirming similar observations [51]. For routine plant monitoring this test should be performed at the operational MLSS.…”
Section: Influence Of Mlss Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Despite the range of methods which have already been used to evaluate foaming characteristics, to date there is no standard method for assessing the foam potential or stability of activated sludge [2] ( Table 1). Due to its simplicity and ease of operation, the Alka-Seltzer test remains the most popular method for both researchers and operators [40,[49][50][51][52]. Some significant relationships have been identified using this test.…”
Section: Assessing Severity Of Activated Sludge Foaming and Use Of Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, under those conditions a reliable identification of M. parvicella is possible. Low rDNA levels, because of low metabolic activity of bacteria, and a possible incomplete permeability of the cell wall for the probe can result in poor quantification of M. parvicella by in situ hybridization (Bradford et al, 1998;Oerther et al, 2001). A more exact quantification using quantitative PCR or qPCR (often referred to as real-time PCR) using the SYBR chemistry has recently been published (Kaetzke et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such foaming is primarily generated by highly hydrophobic cells and metabolites of foam-causing microorganisms, such as Nocadia, Microthix parvicella [5,6] and Gordonia spp. [7]. Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the conditions that lead to the proliferation of filamentous microorganisms in activated sludge in an attempt to define strategies to control foaming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%