Quantifying Facial Feminization Surgery’s Impact: Focus on Patient Facial Satisfaction

Abstract

Background: Facial feminization surgery (FFS) has been associated with improving gender dysphoria in transgender patients. This study aimed to quantify the impact of surgery on patient facial satisfaction, using the FACE-Q and a quality-of-life (QoL) survey. Methods: Transgender female patients were recruited to complete the FACE-Q and the World Health Organization’s QoL Scale-Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) if they were planning to or had undergone FFS at our institution. FACE-Q modules completed included “Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall,” individual facial attributes (forehead/eyebrows, nose, cheeks, cheekbone, chin, jawline, and neck), and the WHOQOL-BREF, which assesses patient QoL through four domains (physical, psychological, social relations, and environment). Both matched and unmatched analyses of preoperative versus postoperative cohorts were performed. Results: Overall, 48 patients participated in our study and completed 31 FACE-Q surveys preoperatively and 37 postoperatively. On average, patients were 37.2 ± 12.5 years old. FACE-Q scores increased significantly for all facial attributes and for Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall between cohorts (P < 0.05). The facial attribute with the greatest increase in satisfaction was the jawline, followed by the nose. The WHOQOL-BREF’s psychological and physical domains both improved significantly (P < 0.05). Wait time for surgery of less than 6 months (b = 22.42, P = 0.02) was associated with higher overall facial satisfaction, whereas age at surgery (b = −1.04, P < 0.01) was associated with lower overall facial satisfaction. Conclusions: Transgender female patients experienced significant improvements in facial satisfaction and QoL after FFS. Undergoing surgery at a younger age and shorter wait times for surgery were associated with increased overall facial satisfaction.

Computerized Surgical Planning in Gender Affirming Facial Surgery

“…15 Previous work has shown GAFS to improve patient satisfaction and quality of life as well as its ability to reduce patient-perceived limitations in social and professional settings. 16,17 Additionally, CSP has been demonstrated to be a safe and accurate tool in GAFS procedures involving bony structures. 18 Preoperative Applications GAFS can be a complex set of procedures with each patient desiring a different combination of changes to both bony and soft-tissue structures throughout the face.…”