2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5173(01)00784-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying electrostatic interactions in pharmaceutical solid systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The charge duration on a surface depends on relaxation time, which is the product of permittivity and surface resistivity of materials. As the majority of pharmaceutical materials are insulators, this process is extended, perhaps over minutes to hours, in comparison to conductive materials (Bailey, 1984;Rowley, 2001). A fundamental understanding of the phenomenon is still elusive (Soh et al, 2012), however, on the basis of existing theories, the mechanism of charge generation can be due to electron transfer, (charge is produced due to the flow of electrons between particles); ion transfer (diffusion of ions between the surface of particles); or due to material transfer (some material is rubbed off from one contacting body and attached onto the surface of another particle).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The charge duration on a surface depends on relaxation time, which is the product of permittivity and surface resistivity of materials. As the majority of pharmaceutical materials are insulators, this process is extended, perhaps over minutes to hours, in comparison to conductive materials (Bailey, 1984;Rowley, 2001). A fundamental understanding of the phenomenon is still elusive (Soh et al, 2012), however, on the basis of existing theories, the mechanism of charge generation can be due to electron transfer, (charge is produced due to the flow of electrons between particles); ion transfer (diffusion of ions between the surface of particles); or due to material transfer (some material is rubbed off from one contacting body and attached onto the surface of another particle).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical structure, functional groups, surface chemistry (Kamiyama et al, 1994;Mazumder et al, 2006;Shinohara et al, 1976), particle size, shape, surface roughness (Carter et al, 1998;Eilbeck et al, 1999;Traini et al, 2012) and electrical properties of powders and contacting surfaces (Bailey and Smedley, 1991;Rowley, 2001) can all affect the tribo-electrification process and subsequent particle surface adhesion. Moreover, the charge transfer process is further complicated due to external factors that may influence the charging process including relative humidity, temperature, nature of contacting material and the velocity of particles (Matsusaka et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed studies on particle sizes have suggested that the magnitude of the charge increases continuously with a decrease in particle size, as indicated in Table 4 [69]. A possible reason is thought to be the adhesion of fine particles (<40 μm) to coarse particles, which eventually enhance the surface roughness of the coarse particles, similar to the effects of the pattern/ microstructure shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 79%
“…This may, in part, be attributed to the small size of IND in comparison to ARG (Fig. 1) since it has been reported that small particles may carry higher charge density than large particles [24]. It is believed that smaller particles have larger specific surface area which in turn increases the number of contacts between particles and surrounding surfaces.…”
Section: Powder Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 97%