2023
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/acaedc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying electron cyclotron power deposition broadening in DIII-D and the potential consequences for the ITER EC system

Abstract: The injection of electron cyclotron (EC) waves fulfills a number of important tasks in nuclear fusion devices for which detailed knowledge of the spatial power deposition profile is critical. This deposition profile is commonly determined using forward models such as beam or ray tracing. Recent numerical and experimental studies have shown that small-angle scattering of the EC beam as it passes through the turbulent plasma edge can cause significant broadening of the effective deposition profile, leading to co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This broadening can hamper the accuracy of the EC power deposition localization, and the underlying mechanisms must be understood to improve the predictive capabilities of the numerical tools. Recent work on DIII-D [5] has shown that the experimentally reconstructed EC power deposition profile is broader than the one obtained using forward ray-tracing modeling by a factor 1. 6-3.6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This broadening can hamper the accuracy of the EC power deposition localization, and the underlying mechanisms must be understood to improve the predictive capabilities of the numerical tools. Recent work on DIII-D [5] has shown that the experimentally reconstructed EC power deposition profile is broader than the one obtained using forward ray-tracing modeling by a factor 1. 6-3.6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, this perturbative technique has been applied in DIII-D to infer the EC power deposition profile from electron temperature measurements, comparing different profile inversion methods [27]. It has been shown that, regardless of the underlying mechanism, the measured EC power deposition profile is broader by a factor 1.6-3.6 with respect to forward ray-tracing modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam size at the resonance is much larger, in small parts due to the divergence of the beam and mostly due to the additional broadening by turbulence (see this paper). Furthermore, given the relative position of launcher and target on the mostly vertical resonance layer and the nearly perpendicular launch of 110 GHz at 2 T in DIII-D (as illustrated in figure 1), the absorption layer thickness aligns along flux surfaces minimizing the impact of deposition width on beam size [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%