Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2014.2366554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Electrode Reliability During Brain–Computer Interface Operation

Abstract: Abstract-One of the problems of non-invasive BrainComputer Interface (BCI) applications is the occurrence of anomalous (unexpected) signals that might degrade BCI performance. This situation might slip the operator's attention since raw signals are not usually continuously visualized and monitored during BCI-actuated device operation. Anomalous data can for instance be the result of electrode misplacement, degrading impedance or loss of connectivity. Since this problem can develop at run-time, there is a need … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 contain the results obtained after 10 measurements for different values of + R and − R . The black line represents the theoretical value of α and β, calculated following (8) and provided that + R and − R are known. Consistency between experimental and theoretical results can be observed.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 7 contain the results obtained after 10 measurements for different values of + R and − R . The black line represents the theoretical value of α and β, calculated following (8) and provided that + R and − R are known. Consistency between experimental and theoretical results can be observed.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kappenman and Luck 7 highlight the importance of electrode impedance on data quality for event-related potentials (ERP) and EEG signals. Sagha et al 8 include high electrode impedance as a source of signal degradation for EEG utilized in brain-computer interfaces. In order to avoid these pernicious effects, the literature sets the limit for the impedance value around 5 kΩ for EEG 6,[9][10][11][12] and for evoked potentials 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the human body, one of the most complex organs that work with billions of cells is the brain [82]. The uncontrolled or abnormal growth of cancerous cells in the body is referred to as tumors [66] [67].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the system presents a minimal user interface with two purposes: on the one hand, a set of switches is utilized to configure each channel in referential (singleended) or differential mode, as well as change the input reference between ground or any other channel. An additional switch permits selecting between normal acquisition mode or impedance measurement mode, needed to insure that excessive contact impedance does not compromise the signal quality [10][11][12]. Incorrect value of contact resistance and configuration status of the analog front-end is indicated visually by means of an array of multicolor LEDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%