1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00873213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying early diabetic retinopathy

Abstract: Summary. A precise and accurate method of numerically quantifying diabetic retinopathy, on standardised retinal colour photographs, has been developed which allows small changes and trends to be monitored. Colour slides are projected onto a screen and features noted on an acetate sheet which provides a permanent record. Sector analysis showed microaneurysms and haemorrhages to occur most often at the temporal-to-macula area, exudates at the macula and cotton wool spots on the nasal side of the retina. Seventy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current assessment of diabetic retinopathy predominantly takes into account the type and number of lesions. However, several studies have shown that quantitative parameters such as the shape, size, location and dynamics of the lesions may contain important information for the assessment of disease progression (Howard‐Williams et al 1986; Bek & Helgesen 2001). A detailed quantitative analysis of these parameters has become feasible with the advent of computerized image analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current assessment of diabetic retinopathy predominantly takes into account the type and number of lesions. However, several studies have shown that quantitative parameters such as the shape, size, location and dynamics of the lesions may contain important information for the assessment of disease progression (Howard‐Williams et al 1986; Bek & Helgesen 2001). A detailed quantitative analysis of these parameters has become feasible with the advent of computerized image analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experience and in other published studies, fluorescein angiography doubles the frequency of diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy [5,6]. Therefore, I disagree with Howard-Williams et al [1], who state that a precise means of assessing colour photographs may be as effective as fluorescein angiography. In fact, it is paradoxical that in many cases fluorescein angiography (a sensitive method) is only performed for patients who already have evidence of retinal lesions by normal ophthalmoscopy (a less sensitive method), so that the initial abnormalities of diabetic retinopathy may not be diagnosed for several years.…”
Section: Early Diabetic Retinopathymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In their paper entitled "Quantifying early diabetic retinopathy", Howard-Williams et al [1] have proposed a new method of quantifying diabetic retinopathy on standardised retinal colour photographs. Since 1943, when Ballantyne and Loewenstein [2] showed that microaneurysms were the early, specific lesions of diabetic retinopathy, approximately 30 classifications of diabetic retinopathy viewed by regular ophthalmoscopy have been described.…”
Section: Early Diabetic Retinopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those that are found are predominantly located in the posterior pole. They appear to have a predisposition for the area temporal to the fovea (Howard-Williams et al 1986;Kern & Engerman 1995;Stitt et al 1995) This might reflect the higher metabolic activity of this retinal area as demonstrated by blood flow rates in this area (Alm & Bill 1973;Rassam et al 1996). Furthermore, the plasmaskimming phenomenon may be of importance (Gaehtgens 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furhermore, one macula-centred 60ae field covered most of the standard fields 1-5, which are considered to be the fields of importance when looking for early retinopathy (Howard-Williams et al 1986;Kern & Engerman 1995;Stitt et al 1995), as well as neovascularisations (Moss et al 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%