2014
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology

Abstract: Food intake is a fundamental parameter in animal studies. Despite the prevalent use of Drosophila in laboratory research, precise measurements of food intake remain challenging in this model organism. Here, we compare several common Drosophila feeding assays: the Capillary Feeder (CAFE), food-labeling with a radioactive tracer or a colorimetric dye, and observations of proboscis extension (PE). We show that the CAFE and radioisotope-labeling provide the most consistent results, have the highest sensitivity, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
235
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
10
235
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Food consumption was assessed using radioisotope labeling of the medium or the capillary feeder (CAFE) assay, as described previously (64). For radiolabeling, [α-32 P]dCTP was used with five flies per vial, unless otherwise noted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food consumption was assessed using radioisotope labeling of the medium or the capillary feeder (CAFE) assay, as described previously (64). For radiolabeling, [α-32 P]dCTP was used with five flies per vial, unless otherwise noted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food labeling by dyes or radioactivity, food uptake quantification by the so-called capillary feeder assay , proboscis extension reflex assay (Shiraiwa and Carlson, 2007), and automated food intake monitoring using the flyPAD or Fly Liquid-Food Interaction Counter (Ro et al, 2014) can be used to quantify feeding. Food preference assays are used to determine important feeding parameters such as total intake, meal size, meal frequency and feeding motivation (reviewed in Branch and Shen, 2017;Deshpande et al, 2014). Collectively, these parameters determine energy intake, which is crucial for the development of obesity.…”
Section: Musclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Further, carbon nanotubes functionalized with a hydroxyl group were reported to not affect the eclosion rate of flies. 24 Assuming a food intake of 1.5 μL per day, 38 we speculate that the maximum amount of CNFs consumed by individual flies was 0.15 or 1.5 μg/fly/day in this study, not considering reduction of feeding rate ( Figure 3B). Although the amount of CNFs in our fly diet was higher than naturally occurring levels, it is plausible for humans to ingest such abundant amounts of nanomaterials since continuous ingestion of contaminated foods or water is the most common route of nanomaterial ingestion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%