2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c01249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Dense Multicomponent Slurries with In-Line ATR-FTIR and Raman Spectroscopies: A Hanford Case Study

Rupanjali Prasad,
Steven H. Crouse,
Ronald W. Rousseau
et al.

Abstract: The multiphase nature of slurries can make them difficult to process and monitor in real time. For example, the nuclear waste slurries present at the Hanford site in Washington State are multicomponent, multiphase, and inhomogeneous. Current analytical techniques for analyzing radioactive waste at Hanford rely on laboratory results from an on-site analytical laboratory, which can delay processing speed and create exposure risks for workers. However, in-line probes can provide an alternative route to collect th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, in case study 3, IRCB was tested to predict the concentrations of five solids within a complex slurry using Raman spectroscopy. For case studies 2 and 3, the modeling results may be compared to the previously published benchmarks. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Lastly, in case study 3, IRCB was tested to predict the concentrations of five solids within a complex slurry using Raman spectroscopy. For case studies 2 and 3, the modeling results may be compared to the previously published benchmarks. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical metrics of the test set prediction are shown and compared with the previously reported PLS-R results in Table . The PLS-R model from the previously work utilized 10 principal components and the application of Savitzky–Golay filter …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations