Abstract:The establishment of nonnative predators can have devastating consequences for native fish communities, but predation rates are often difficult to quantify due to spatial and temporal variation in predator foraging behavior. Predation by Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus throughout the Colorado River basin potentially threatens the recovery of native fishes. Because Channel Catfish are highly opportunistic feeders, an understanding of how piscivory by this species impacts prey populations should help to guid… Show more
“…This result could represent density‐dependent population regulation, in part via cannibalism (e.g., Lobón‐Cerviá, 2014). For instance, 50% of the fish prey identified in diets of adult channel catfish from the San Juan River were other channel catfish (Hedden et al, 2020). This result could also reflect a compensatory recruitment response to removal of adult channel catfish on the San Juan River, whereby removal of adults reduces predation pressure or frees up resources for juvenile fish (Pennock et al, 2018).…”
Dams can be operated to mimic components of the natural flow regime to minimise impacts on downstream ecosystems. However, infrastructure, societal needs, water management, and catchment runoff constrain which and when flow regime attributes can be mimicked.
We compared fish assemblage responses, including native and non‐native species, over 2 decades of managed environmental flows to those in a river retaining a relatively unaltered flow regime. Both of these arid‐land rivers are within the overallocated Colorado River basin and have experienced declines in catchment runoff over the past 20 years. We predicted that fish–flow relationships would be conserved across time and between managed and unmanaged rivers.
Declines in flow in both rivers coincided with declines in some native fishes, and more native and non‐native fish species exhibited declines in the managed river than in the unmanaged river. Our ability to detect previously documented native fish–flow relationships diminished in the managed river system because established environmental flow targets were not met due to water management, but we detected these fish–flow relationships in the unmanaged river.
Our results suggest declining catchment runoff and increased consumptive water use could reduce the effectiveness of environmental flows that have lower priority in most years.
“…This result could represent density‐dependent population regulation, in part via cannibalism (e.g., Lobón‐Cerviá, 2014). For instance, 50% of the fish prey identified in diets of adult channel catfish from the San Juan River were other channel catfish (Hedden et al, 2020). This result could also reflect a compensatory recruitment response to removal of adult channel catfish on the San Juan River, whereby removal of adults reduces predation pressure or frees up resources for juvenile fish (Pennock et al, 2018).…”
Dams can be operated to mimic components of the natural flow regime to minimise impacts on downstream ecosystems. However, infrastructure, societal needs, water management, and catchment runoff constrain which and when flow regime attributes can be mimicked.
We compared fish assemblage responses, including native and non‐native species, over 2 decades of managed environmental flows to those in a river retaining a relatively unaltered flow regime. Both of these arid‐land rivers are within the overallocated Colorado River basin and have experienced declines in catchment runoff over the past 20 years. We predicted that fish–flow relationships would be conserved across time and between managed and unmanaged rivers.
Declines in flow in both rivers coincided with declines in some native fishes, and more native and non‐native fish species exhibited declines in the managed river than in the unmanaged river. Our ability to detect previously documented native fish–flow relationships diminished in the managed river system because established environmental flow targets were not met due to water management, but we detected these fish–flow relationships in the unmanaged river.
Our results suggest declining catchment runoff and increased consumptive water use could reduce the effectiveness of environmental flows that have lower priority in most years.
“…In contrast, P. lucius , a presumed piscivore 72 , exhibited a relatively small probability of overlap with other species, but this was dependent on the habitat. Some nonnative species, such as I. punctatus , are hypothesized to limit populations of native fish in the Colorado River basin through predation 73 , 74 . Our results suggest relatively little overlap between P. lucius , the species with the highest δ 15 N in the river upstream and I. punctatus , and supports other observations of limited piscivory by I. punctatus in the San Juan River 74 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some nonnative species, such as I. punctatus , are hypothesized to limit populations of native fish in the Colorado River basin through predation 73 , 74 . Our results suggest relatively little overlap between P. lucius , the species with the highest δ 15 N in the river upstream and I. punctatus , and supports other observations of limited piscivory by I. punctatus in the San Juan River 74 . Although we observed more overlap among species in the two habitats downstream of the waterfall, we do not expect competition is a strong driver of assemblage dynamics as river-reservoir inflows are not likely resource-limited 26 , 75 , 76 .…”
Instream barriers can constrain dispersal of nonnative fishes, creating opportunities to test their impact on native communities above and below these barriers. Deposition of sediments in a river inflow to Lake Powell, USA resulted in creation of a large waterfall prohibiting upstream movement of fishes from the reservoir allowing us to evaluate the trophic niche of fishes above and below this barrier. We expected niche overlap among native and nonnative species would increase in local assemblages downstream of the barrier where nonnative fish diversity and abundance were higher. Fishes upstream of the barrier had more distinct isotopic niches and species exhibited a wider range in δ15N relative to downstream. In the reservoir, species were more constrained in δ15N and differed more in δ13C, representing a shorter, wider food web. Differences in energetic pathways and resource availability among habitats likely contributed to differences in isotopic niches. Endangered Razorback Sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) aggregate at some reservoir inflows in the Colorado River basin, and this is where we found the highest niche overlap among species. Whether isotopic niche overlap among adult native and nonnative species has negative consequences is unclear, because data on resource availability and use are lacking; however, these observations do indicate the potential for competition. Still, the impacts of diet overlap among trophic generalists, such as Razorback Sucker, are likely low, particularly in habitats with diverse and abundant food bases such as river-reservoir inflows.
“…This pattern in nonnative catfish populations is seen with Blue Catfish I. furcatus (Fabrizio et al 2021;Hilling et al 2021;Nepal and Fabrizio 2021; all this special issue), bullheads Ameiurus spp. (Barabe 2021;Sikora et al 2021; both this special issue), Channel Catfish I. punctatus (Pennock et al 2018;Hedden et al 2021, this special issue), and Flathead Catfish Pylodictis olivaris (Hedden et al 2016;Massie et al 2018;Schmitt et al 2019;Smith et al 2021, this special issue), which was summarized by Montague and Shoup (2021, this special issue). The extent, ecology, and impacts of nonnative, invasive catfish populations are becoming better understood over time, and Fabrizio et al ( 2021) described the conflicts involved in managing invasive catfish.…”
Section: Ecology and Conservationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2018; Hedden et al. 2021, this special issue), and Flathead Catfish Pylodictis olivaris (Hedden et al. 2016; Massie et al.…”
The Third International Catfish Symposium was held in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 2020 and provided another milestone to gauge advances in knowledge related to conservation and management of these valuable fishes. Attendees from 29 states and 4 countries gathered to communicate research and information on the conservation, ecology, and management of the world’s catfishes. During 3 d of technical sessions and workshops, 74 oral presentations and 17 posters were shared with 198 attending fisheries professionals. Plenary and oral presentations were recorded and are available online (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHNt7ZV05DLWoe4qJO798Pw/videos), aligning with the symposium theme of “Communicating Catfish Science.” Technical sessions explored current research and management issues that included population demographics, introduced catfish populations, sampling methods, harvest management, human dimensions, conservation, habitat use and movement, biology, and aging methods. Ultimately, 38 manuscripts were peer reviewed and published as this special issue of the North American Journal of Fisheries Management. Interest in catfish science, as gauged by publications in six peer‐reviewed fisheries journals, has grown steadily since a 1910 catfish aquaculture article appeared in the Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. Biology and ecology topics became prominent in the 1970s and 1980s, while articles on techniques and fisheries management have grown steadily through 2020. Ecology, fisheries management, and techniques were the most published topics in the three international catfish symposia. Future research and management efforts will continue similar work but also seek to address the expanding role of catfish as invasive species and a better understanding of the ecology and conservation of small‐bodied native catfish. Among the greatest challenges will be adapting current tools and identifying future knowledge gaps as we experience a changing climate. This will require an enhanced understanding of transforming ecosystems and advanced adaptive management applications. The decadal occurrence of a dedicated symposium has served to summarize progress and focus future efforts to advance catfish science.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.