2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying brain iron deposition in patients with Parkinson's disease using quantitative susceptibility mapping, R2 and R2*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
199
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
20
199
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They rely on the assumption that the [Fe] is the sole determinant of either T 2 or T 2 *, and ignore the many other contributions to transverse relaxation. Other methods, such as QSM, [47][48][49] require measurement of the absolute tissue susceptibility and suffer from the large background variations in the phase of the MR image due to susceptibility variations independent of [Fe] or from susceptibility jumps at the air-tissue boundaries of the body. Also, the expertise and software to accomplish QSM are not widely available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They rely on the assumption that the [Fe] is the sole determinant of either T 2 or T 2 *, and ignore the many other contributions to transverse relaxation. Other methods, such as QSM, [47][48][49] require measurement of the absolute tissue susceptibility and suffer from the large background variations in the phase of the MR image due to susceptibility variations independent of [Fe] or from susceptibility jumps at the air-tissue boundaries of the body. Also, the expertise and software to accomplish QSM are not widely available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 Nevertheless, the production of susceptibility maps requires particular acquisition settings: in most quantitative susceptibility mapping implementations such as ours, the MR imaging system is programmed to provide the complex MR imaging data divided into real and imaginary parts, which are of no radiologic use. In fact, quantitative susceptibility mapping requires additional scan time in addition to the conventional 3D T2* multiecho sequence that is included in the clinical protocol.…”
Section: Methodsologic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies comparing QSM and R2* as surrogate markers of brain iron deposition within cortical regions of healthy young individuals (Deistung et al, 2013) and in subcortical regions in PD (Barbosa et al, 2015), have shown QSM may provide superior sensitivity to detect differences in local GM. No study to date, however, has directly compared QSM and R2* differences as a result of normal aging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%