Quantifying biopsychosocial aspects in everyday contexts: an integrative methodological approach from the behavioral sciences

Abstract

Contextual factors are crucial for evaluative research in psychology, as they provide insights into what works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects, and why. Studying behavior in context, however, poses numerous methodological challenges. Although a comprehensive framework for classifying methods seeking to quantify biopsychosocial aspects in everyday contexts was recently proposed, this framework does not contemplate contributions from observational methodology. The aim of this paper is to justify and propose a more general framework that includes observational methodology approaches. Our analysis is rooted in two general concepts: ecological validity and methodological complementarity. We performed a narrative review of the literature on research methods and techniques for studying daily life and describe their shared properties and requirements (collection of data in real time, on repeated occasions, and in natural settings) and classification criteria (eg, variables of interest and level of participant involvement in the data collection process). We provide several examples that illustrate why, despite their higher costs, studies of behavior and experience in everyday contexts offer insights that complement findings provided by other methodological approaches. We urge that observational methodology be included in classifications of research methods and techniques for studying everyday behavior and advocate a renewed commitment to prioritizing ecological validity in behavioral research seeking to quantify biopsychosocial aspects.

How Game Location Affects Soccer Performance: T-Pattern Analysis of Attack Actions in Home and Away Matches

“…We designed an ad hoc observation instrument, and observation was active, methodologically rigorous, non-participative, and characterized by total perceptivity. The systematic observation became more and more widespread within sport research (Lapresa et al, 2013a , b ), because of its high flexibility and adaptability (Sánchez-Algarra and Anguera, 2013 ; Portell et al, 2015b ).…”

The Specificity of Observational Studies in Physical Activity and Sports Sciences: Moving Forward in Mixed Methods Research and Proposals for Achieving Quantitative and Qualitative Symmetry

“…These include selecting dimensions and subdimensions designed to answer the research question, taking decisions on segmentation of the observable date into units, proposing a design for each research objective, building a purpose-designed observation instrument, creating a computerized coded dataset that allows the data to be arranged into matrices of codes, checking the reliability and variability of the data collected, and analyzing the behavioral patterns hidden within the code matrices using robust analytical techniques for categorical data. Systematic observation is the main procedure used to collect data in event analysis (Happ et al, 2004) and there is ample experience with its use and evidence of its potential (Anguera, 1979, 2003; Portell et al, 2015b). …”

Notational, sequential, and T-patterns analysis of the tactical schemes of a professional Futsal team

“…to develop these studies, we applied the observational methodology, a scientific procedure which, with the consideration of defined objectives, allows to code perceptual behaviours with a specifically constructed instrument [19,20]. this methodology enables organized registration and quantification of game actions in the natural context [21], which favours ecological validity [22], as the game is studied in its usual dynamics. the observational design of the research is ideographic (study of a team), sequential -involves follow-up (along the journeys of the futsal league), multidimensional (various dimensions studied of the tactical diagrams), and intensive (data of behaviour sequences) (I/S/M/I, ideographic, sequential, multidimensional, intensive) [23].…”