2016
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying bias in survival estimates resulting from loss to follow‐up among children with lymphoma in Malawi

Abstract: Pediatric lymphoma is common in sub-Saharan Africa, where survival estimates are often based on limited follow-up with incomplete retention, introducing potential for bias. We compared follow-up and overall survival (OS) between passive and active tracing within a prospective cohort of children with lymphoma in Malawi. Median follow-up times were 4.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0–9.4) and 10.8 months (IQR 6.2–20.6) in passive and active follow-up, respectively. Twelve-month overall survival (OS) was 69… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes our study potentially more generalizable than others in SSA, which often describe only participants who survived long enough to receive chemotherapy or with excluded participants for other reasons (Mwanda et al , ; Bateganya et al , ; de Witt et al , ). We had no participants lost to follow‐up during the study period utilizing frequent, active mobile phone tracing by staff, limiting overestimation of survival which reliably results from loss to follow‐up in SSA (Stanley et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes our study potentially more generalizable than others in SSA, which often describe only participants who survived long enough to receive chemotherapy or with excluded participants for other reasons (Mwanda et al , ; Bateganya et al , ; de Witt et al , ). We had no participants lost to follow‐up during the study period utilizing frequent, active mobile phone tracing by staff, limiting overestimation of survival which reliably results from loss to follow‐up in SSA (Stanley et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study was nested within the prospective Kamuzu Central Hospital Lymphoma Study observational cohort in Lilongwe, Malawi, which has been previously described in detail [4, 5, 12]. These analyses focused on children less than 18 years of age with newly diagnosed lymphoma at our center, enrolled between June 2013 and March 2016.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transport reimbursements were provided to families who attended clinic to encourage retention throughout care. We have also previously described successful use of cell phone tracing to ascertain vital status in nearly all children [4, 5, 12]. For this study focused on risk factors and reasons for defaulting from care, treatment abandonment during treatment was defined as failure to attend clinic within four weeks of a prescribed chemotherapy appointment [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removing very sick children from analyses improves survival relative to descriptions of more unselected patient populations. Additionally, in sub-Saharan Africa, failure to appropriately account for loss to follow-up results in overestimated survival for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma and paediatric lymphoma, as mortality is a major cause of loss to follow-up in these environments, where death often occurs at home and may be frequently unascertained without very active tracing (Stanley et al , 2016a). We believe these are important considerations in contextualizing otherwise important data presented by Molyneux and colleagues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%