2013
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying attentional modulation of auditory-evoked cortical responses from single-trial electroencephalography

Abstract: Selective auditory attention is essential for human listeners to be able to communicate in multi-source environments. Selective attention is known to modulate the neural representation of the auditory scene, boosting the representation of a target sound relative to the background, but the strength of this modulation, and the mechanisms contributing to it, are not well understood. Here, listeners performed a behavioral experiment demanding sustained, focused spatial auditory attention while we measured cortical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
79
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(58 reference statements)
9
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3 s long sound streams originated from center, left and right locations and differed in a number of sound features as well as in the number of tones presented (3, 4, and 5, respectively). In this study, a replication of earlier multi-channel cap-EEG results (Choi et al, 2013) was possible with both high-density cap-EEG as well as cEEGrid ear-EEG. For both setups clear attention modulated ERPs in response to the attended sound stream were detected (Figure 5), and comparable single-trial classification accuracies at around 70% were achieved.…”
Section: Ceegrid Sensitivity—comparison To Cap-eegsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The 3 s long sound streams originated from center, left and right locations and differed in a number of sound features as well as in the number of tones presented (3, 4, and 5, respectively). In this study, a replication of earlier multi-channel cap-EEG results (Choi et al, 2013) was possible with both high-density cap-EEG as well as cEEGrid ear-EEG. For both setups clear attention modulated ERPs in response to the attended sound stream were detected (Figure 5), and comparable single-trial classification accuracies at around 70% were achieved.…”
Section: Ceegrid Sensitivity—comparison To Cap-eegsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For instance, any single recording of EEG or MEG is noisy, making it is hard to see specific events or to quantify attentional effects. However, by looking at which sound stream better predicts the evoked response to a short, 2-to 3-s-long recorded EEG or MEG pattern, it is possible to determine which source a listener is attending to (Choi, Rajaram, Varghese, & Shinn-Cunningham, 2013;Ding & Simon, 2012a, 2012bLalor & Foxe, 2010;O'Sullivan et al, 2014;Power, Foxe, Forde, Reilly, & Lalor, 2012;Rimmele, Zion Golumbic, Schroger, & Poeppel, 2015). Intracranial recordings (electrocorticography) in human listeners, which allow direct measurement of very localized brain activity, demonstrate the full power of attention on cortical encoding of speech in human listeners (e.g., Zion Golumbic, Ding, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Attention Modulates What Information Is Encoded In Sensory Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the ability to decode attentional state from neural responses differs across listeners and correlates with differences in the strength of attentional modulation of the cortical response (e.g., Choi et al, 2013;O'Sullivan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Individuals Differ In Their Ability To Control Selective Attmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auditory selectivity during DDL is believed to include enhancement of the attended stream and suppression of the unattended stream (Choi, et al, 2013; Golumbic et al, 2013; Chait, et al, 2010). Cortical oscillations within the alpha band are a key marker of selective attention thought to reflect suppression of task-irrelevant information in several sensory modalities (Payne & Sekuler, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%