2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-012-0939-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying and relating land-surface and subsurface variability in permafrost environments using LiDAR and surface geophysical datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

6
202
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
6
202
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hauck et al (2011) developed a four-phase model of soil matrix, ice, liquid and air and used it to estimate soil liquid and ice content from combined ERT and seismic measurements in the Swiss Alps. Hubbard et al (2013) combined lidar data with multiple geophysical (ERT, GPR, electromagnetic) and point measurements to characterize active-layer thickness and permafrost variability in a large area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hauck et al (2011) developed a four-phase model of soil matrix, ice, liquid and air and used it to estimate soil liquid and ice content from combined ERT and seismic measurements in the Swiss Alps. Hubbard et al (2013) combined lidar data with multiple geophysical (ERT, GPR, electromagnetic) and point measurements to characterize active-layer thickness and permafrost variability in a large area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhardwaj et al (2016) identifies Light detection and ranging (LiDAR), also referred to as laser scanning (Höfle and Rutzinger, 2011), as potentially being the best tool for increasing the performance of measuring permafrost-related processes, such as mass movements, vegetation dynamics and topographical characteristics (Bhardwaj et al, 2016). By combining point measurements with airborne laser scanning (ALS), and geophysical datasets, the study of Hubbard et al (2013) indicates a close linkage between micro-topography, active layer, and permafrost variability. This linkage of subsurface and land surface 15 variabilities emphasizes the potential of laser scanning to indirectly characterize subsurface properties in permafrost environments in a non-invasive manner (Hubbard et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining point measurements with airborne laser scanning (ALS), and geophysical datasets, the study of Hubbard et al (2013) indicates a close linkage between micro-topography, active layer, and permafrost variability. This linkage of subsurface and land surface 15 variabilities emphasizes the potential of laser scanning to indirectly characterize subsurface properties in permafrost environments in a non-invasive manner (Hubbard et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant cross-sections reveal ground compartments, which differ in terms of geoelectric properties. So far, electrical imaging providing this degree of detail of patterned ground structure has been presented very rarely, usually in relation to the permafrost in general and land surface dominated by polygonal features (e.g., Hubbard et al 2013). The method employed in the study is suitable for waterlogged ground, built of coarse material, where trenching would be tough and ineffective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%