The negative‐tone epoxy photoresist, SU‐8, expands ≈1% by volume after postexposure baking. However, if the maximum optical fluence is comparable to that at the insolubility threshold, as in a holographic exposure, the developed resist shrinks (≈35% by volume) due to the removal of light oligomers not incorporated into the polymeric network. IR spectroscopy shows that, at this level of exposure, only 15% of the epoxy groups in the insoluble polymer have reacted; consequently microstructural elements soften and collapse at >100 °C. When the light oligomers are removed, the sensitivity of the resist is unchanged, provided that 5% (w/w) of a high‐molecular‐weight reactive plasticizer (glycidoxy‐terminated polyethylene glycol) is added, but it shrinks less on development and, when used as a photonic crystal template, shows improved uniformity with less cracking and buckling. Reinforcing the polymer network by reaction with the polyfunctional amine (bis‐N,N′‐(3‐aminopropyl)ethylenediamine) increases the extent of cross‐linking and the thermal stability, allowing inverse replicas of photonic crystal templates to be fabricated from both Al:ZnO and Zr3N4 using atomic layer deposition at temperatures up to 200 °C.