Quantification of vincristine and tariquidar by liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry in mouse whole blood using volumetric absorptive microsampling for pharmacokinetic applications
Abstract:A liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of vincristine and tariquidar in 10 μL of mouse whole blood using volumetric absorptive microsampling devices. Samples were extracted from the devices and quantified against calibrators prepared in a human blood plasma matrix. Separation of vincristine and tariquidar was achieved using a Shimpack XR ODS III C18 stationary phase and H2O and methanol mobile phase solvents containing 0.1% formic… Show more
“…In the work of Rosser et al., the PK assessment of vincristine and tariquidar in mice using an LC‐MS/MS approach was effectively carried out using the VAMS technology. Assessment of both single‐agent therapy and combination therapy over a 24 h period in 10 µL microsamples revealed a 2.3‐fold increase in vincristine drug exposure when combined with tariquidar, which validated the use of the approach for longitudinal analysis of drug exposure in animal studies 27 . Xu et al.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…90 Guidelines that consolidate the regulatory perspectives on microsampling and support its use in blood sampling have also been added to and reviewed by the which validated the use of the approach for longitudinal analysis of drug exposure in animal studies. 27 Xu et al evaluated the feasibility of CMS coupled to HPLC-MS/MS for mice PK studies using transresveratrol as the model drug. The PK parameters of the drug and its associated metabolites found in the study were comparable with those reported in previous studies, which demonstrated that CMS provides credible samples for subsequent quantitative PK analysis.…”
Section: Volume-limited Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 Furthermore, paper‐based ionization techniques such as paper spray ionization (PSI) for MS have enabled the direct analysis of a broad spectrum of analytes in dried microsamples without the requirement of any prior sample pretreatment. 21 These sophisticated approaches have driven the implementation of microsampling in various biomedical domains; newborn and metabolic screening, 22 , 23 biomarker research, 21 , 24 , 25 pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies, 26 , 27 therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 forensic toxicology, 34 , 35 , 36 sports anti‐doping, 37 , 38 , 39 metabolomics 22 , 40 , 41 and proteomics. 24 , 42 , 43 Since 70% of medical decisions are governed by diagnostic blood tests, 44 several medical technology companies are investing in the development of innovative at‐home blood microsampling devices to make blood work more accessible and convenient.…”
With the development of highly sensitive bioanalytical techniques, the volume of samples necessary for accurate analysis has reduced. Microsampling, the process of obtaining small amounts of blood, has thus gained popularity as it offers minimal‐invasiveness, reduced logistical costs and biohazard risks while simultaneously showing increased sample stability and a potential for the decentralization of the approach and at‐home self‐sampling. Although the benefits of microsampling have been recognised, its adoption in clinical practice has been slow. Several microsampling technologies and devices are currently available and employed in research studies for various biomedical applications. This review provides an overview of the state‐of‐the‐art in microsampling technology with a focus on the latest developments and advancements in the field of microsampling. Research published in the year 2022, including studies (i) developing strategies for the quantitation of analytes in microsamples and (ii) bridging and comparing the interchangeability between matrices and choice of technology for a given application, is reviewed to assess the advantages, challenges and limitations of the current state of microsampling. Successful implementation of microsampling in routine clinical care requires continued efforts for standardization and harmonization. Microsampling has been shown to facilitate data‐rich studies and a patient‐centric approach to healthcare and is foreseen to play a central role in the future digital revolution of healthcare through continuous monitoring to improve the quality of life.
“…In the work of Rosser et al., the PK assessment of vincristine and tariquidar in mice using an LC‐MS/MS approach was effectively carried out using the VAMS technology. Assessment of both single‐agent therapy and combination therapy over a 24 h period in 10 µL microsamples revealed a 2.3‐fold increase in vincristine drug exposure when combined with tariquidar, which validated the use of the approach for longitudinal analysis of drug exposure in animal studies 27 . Xu et al.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…90 Guidelines that consolidate the regulatory perspectives on microsampling and support its use in blood sampling have also been added to and reviewed by the which validated the use of the approach for longitudinal analysis of drug exposure in animal studies. 27 Xu et al evaluated the feasibility of CMS coupled to HPLC-MS/MS for mice PK studies using transresveratrol as the model drug. The PK parameters of the drug and its associated metabolites found in the study were comparable with those reported in previous studies, which demonstrated that CMS provides credible samples for subsequent quantitative PK analysis.…”
Section: Volume-limited Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 Furthermore, paper‐based ionization techniques such as paper spray ionization (PSI) for MS have enabled the direct analysis of a broad spectrum of analytes in dried microsamples without the requirement of any prior sample pretreatment. 21 These sophisticated approaches have driven the implementation of microsampling in various biomedical domains; newborn and metabolic screening, 22 , 23 biomarker research, 21 , 24 , 25 pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies, 26 , 27 therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 forensic toxicology, 34 , 35 , 36 sports anti‐doping, 37 , 38 , 39 metabolomics 22 , 40 , 41 and proteomics. 24 , 42 , 43 Since 70% of medical decisions are governed by diagnostic blood tests, 44 several medical technology companies are investing in the development of innovative at‐home blood microsampling devices to make blood work more accessible and convenient.…”
With the development of highly sensitive bioanalytical techniques, the volume of samples necessary for accurate analysis has reduced. Microsampling, the process of obtaining small amounts of blood, has thus gained popularity as it offers minimal‐invasiveness, reduced logistical costs and biohazard risks while simultaneously showing increased sample stability and a potential for the decentralization of the approach and at‐home self‐sampling. Although the benefits of microsampling have been recognised, its adoption in clinical practice has been slow. Several microsampling technologies and devices are currently available and employed in research studies for various biomedical applications. This review provides an overview of the state‐of‐the‐art in microsampling technology with a focus on the latest developments and advancements in the field of microsampling. Research published in the year 2022, including studies (i) developing strategies for the quantitation of analytes in microsamples and (ii) bridging and comparing the interchangeability between matrices and choice of technology for a given application, is reviewed to assess the advantages, challenges and limitations of the current state of microsampling. Successful implementation of microsampling in routine clinical care requires continued efforts for standardization and harmonization. Microsampling has been shown to facilitate data‐rich studies and a patient‐centric approach to healthcare and is foreseen to play a central role in the future digital revolution of healthcare through continuous monitoring to improve the quality of life.
“…They have no pharmacological interactions with chemotherapeutic drugs and have been discovered to be 200 times more powerful than the previous two generations of inhibitors. Zosuquidar (LY335979), mitotane (NSC-38721), laniquidar (R101933) [71], tariquidar (XR9576) [72], ONT-093, elacridar (F12091), annamycin, HM30181, R10933, and biricodar are other examples [73]. According to the 3D QSAR and QSAR activity, the structure of the inhibitors is mostly responsible for producing the inhibitory activities.…”
Section: Substrates Of P-gp and Its Drug Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the expression of the T-cell exhaustion markers PD-1 and CTLA-4 was reduced in this subset of CD4+helper-T cells. It has been demonstrated that Th17 and Th1 CD4+T-helper cell subsets secrete anti-tumour inflammatory cytotoxic cy-tokines such as IL-17, IFNg, TNFa, and granzyme [72,104,105]. P-gp-expressing CD4+T cells (CD4+CD73+T cells) were found to secrete more anti-cancer cytokines in tumourinfiltrating breast and ovarian carcinomas.…”
Section: Tumour Immunity and P-gp Functionmentioning
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a major factor in the multidrug resistance phenotype in cancer cells. P-gp is a protein that regulates the ATP-dependent efflux of a wide range of anticancer medicines and confers resistance. Due to its wide specificity, several attempts have been made to block the action of P-gp to restore the efficacy of anticancer drugs. The major goal has been to create molecules that either compete with anticancer medicines for transport or function as a direct P-gp inhibitor. Despite significant in vitro success, there are presently no drugs available in the clinic that can “block” P-gp–mediated resistance. Toxicity, unfavourable pharmacological interactions, and a variety of pharmacokinetic difficulties might all be the reason for the failure. On the other hand, P-gp has a significant effect in the body. It protects the vital organs from the entry of foreign bodies and other toxic chemicals. Hence, the inhibitors of P-gp should not hinder its action in the normal cells. To develop an effective inhibitor of P-gp, thorough background knowledge is needed in this field. The main aim of this review article was to set forth the merits and demerits of the action of P-gp on cancer cells as well as on normal cells. The influence of P-gp on cancer drug delivery and the contribution of P-gp to activating drug resistance were also mentioned.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.