2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03098.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of upper extremity function and range of motion in children with cerebral palsy

Abstract: This study evaluated the hypothesis that upper extremity function and range of motion can be quantified reliably in children with cerebral palsy (CP) in a busy clinical setting. The specific aim was to determine the inter-and intrarater reliability of a modified House Functional Classification (MHC) system to evaluate upper extremity function and a standardized instrument to document upper extremity range of motion (Upper Extremity Rating Scale [UERS]). Sixty-five children with CP (43 males, 22 females, mean a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
76
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Hand function in the patients with CP was classified according to House, where 0 is no use of the hand, 1 to 3 different levels of passive helper hand, 4 to 6 different levels of active helper hand, and 7 to 8 a hand that can manipulate [9,11,28]. Gross motor function (ambulation ability) was assessed according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), where GMFCS I refers to independent ambulation without limitations and GMFCS V refers to when a child cannot drive an electric wheelchair by him/herself but has to be driven by someone else [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hand function in the patients with CP was classified according to House, where 0 is no use of the hand, 1 to 3 different levels of passive helper hand, 4 to 6 different levels of active helper hand, and 7 to 8 a hand that can manipulate [9,11,28]. Gross motor function (ambulation ability) was assessed according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), where GMFCS I refers to independent ambulation without limitations and GMFCS V refers to when a child cannot drive an electric wheelchair by him/herself but has to be driven by someone else [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, validity for two of the tools (Jebson Taylor Hand Function Test and House Scale) had been challenged by subsequent investigators [7,8,22,23,31,61].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no manual. A Modified House Classification (MHC) that incorporates 32 additional descriptors to the nine-point rating scale has been developed [31].…”
Section: House Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 In a brief review in this paper of existing valid measures of upper limb function, the limitations of the more frequently used assessments all suggested that none captured the functional capacity of the affected hand, especially while performing bimanual activities. Interestingly, the authors refined a reliable and valid evaluation of upper extremity function, the Modified House Classification (MHC) 3 in order to develop a valid tool that measures the manual capacity of children with unilateral CP. The refined measure defined a new uni-dimensional 14-item set from the MHC indicating that the 14 items worked well together to measure an upper extremity construct.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%