2023
DOI: 10.1029/2022jd037706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the Volcanic Carbon Dioxide in the Air of Vulcano Porto by Stable Isotope Surveys

Abstract: Injecting volcanic gas into the air leads to an increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) levels compared with background concentrations and may establish gas hazard conditions. This study reports the results of five stable isotope (i.e., δ13C‐CO2 and δ18O‐CO2) surveys of airborne CO2 on Vulcano from August 2020 to November 2021. To measure CO2 in the air, a mobile laboratory was equipped with a laser‐based spectrophotometer that can selectively detect different CO2 isotopologues. Volcanic CO2 has a different isotopic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(13 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(147 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The four stations measure the ϕCO 2 in the inhabited zone of Vulcano Porto. This study includes the recording of ϕCO 2 during a period of remarkable changes in volcanic degassing due to an increase in magmatic degassing at depth [45][46][47][48]. Overall, statistics for the data collected from each station during the September 2021-December 2022 time window (Table 1) show that the ϕCO 2 at Carapezza and Rojas is within the range of emissions from soil respiration [81][82][83], while the average ϕCO 2 at both Porto and Castello is an order of magnitude higher.…”
Section: Soil Co 2 Flux Continuous Monitoring (ϕCo 2 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The four stations measure the ϕCO 2 in the inhabited zone of Vulcano Porto. This study includes the recording of ϕCO 2 during a period of remarkable changes in volcanic degassing due to an increase in magmatic degassing at depth [45][46][47][48]. Overall, statistics for the data collected from each station during the September 2021-December 2022 time window (Table 1) show that the ϕCO 2 at Carapezza and Rojas is within the range of emissions from soil respiration [81][82][83], while the average ϕCO 2 at both Porto and Castello is an order of magnitude higher.…”
Section: Soil Co 2 Flux Continuous Monitoring (ϕCo 2 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gas hazard in volcanic regions is an interface problem caused by the interplay among diffuse degassing, plume dispersal into the La Fossa caldera from the crater rim, and atmospheric turbulence conditions [34,46,77,84,85]. The Rojas monitoring station includes sensors to measure several weather variables that affect both ϕCO 2 and the dispersion of CO 2 in the air in the inhabited zone of Vulcano Porto.…”
Section: Changes In the Atmospheric Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations