2001
DOI: 10.1109/7333.918274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the UPDRS rigidity scale

Abstract: Abstract-In the clinical setting, parkinsonian rigidity is assessed using subjective rating scales such as that of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating System (UPDRS). However, such scales are susceptible to problems of sensitivity and reliability. Here, we evaluate the reliability and validity of a device designed to quantify parkinsonian rigidity at the elbow and the wrist. The method essentially quantifies the clinical examination and employs small sensors to monitor forces and angular displacements impos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finger angular velocity was measured with solid state gyroscopes (model G-1, NeuroKinetics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada), and bradykinesia was determined from the peak of the resulting power spectrum. The finger tapping trials were interleaved with rigidity measurements using a clinical impedance measurement device (model RA-1, NeuroKinetics) which has been validated against UPDRS item 22 (Patrick et al, 2001). …”
Section: Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finger angular velocity was measured with solid state gyroscopes (model G-1, NeuroKinetics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada), and bradykinesia was determined from the peak of the resulting power spectrum. The finger tapping trials were interleaved with rigidity measurements using a clinical impedance measurement device (model RA-1, NeuroKinetics) which has been validated against UPDRS item 22 (Patrick et al, 2001). …”
Section: Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity and reliability of the device and its use in measuring parkinsonian rigidity have been described (Patrick et al, 2001;Prochazka et al, 1997). Briefly, the device consists of an inflatable cuff force transducer and a gyro-based velocity sensor.…”
Section: Quantitative Measures Of Motor Behavior Rigiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a 50-second trial yields a 46-second recording of impedance, that reliably reflects clinically rated parkinsonian rigidity (Patrick et al, 2001). Impedance data were analyzed offline using Origin statistical software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA).…”
Section: Data Analysis Rigiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods of measuring the classical symptoms of PD in an objective and quantitative way have been proposed (Ghika et al 1993;Jobbagy et al 1998), specifically for tapping test (Ziv et al 1999;Yahalom et al 2004), the quantification of rigidity (Patrick et al 2001), handwriting (Eichhorn et al 1996), to evaluate FOG (Han et al 2003;Moore et al 2008), or to assess MBs in hand movements (Popovic et al 2002). Ghika et al (1993) designed portable system based upon a PC to measure tremor, bradikinezia, and muscle tone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ziv et al (1999) developed method for computerized quantitative measurements of the frequency, duration and temporal profile of MMBs during performance of manual tapping test. Patrick et al (2001) designed a device to quantify rigidity at the elbow and the wrist. The method quantifies the clinical examination with sensors that monitor forces and angular displacements imposed by clinician onto the limb segment distal to the joint being evaluated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%