2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2014.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the transient and long-term response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to carbon dioxide stresses of various intensities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Elevated CO 2 (50%) did not, by itself, affect the biomass yield or viability of S. cerevisiae as compared to those under reference conditions (Table 1), and, accordingly, triggered only a weak transcriptional response ( Figure 5). This result appears to contradict results from two independent previous studies on the same strain, performed at CO 2 levels of 50% and 79%, under fully respiratory conditions (Aguilera et al, 2005;Eigenstetter & Takors, 2017;Richard et al, 2014). This apparent discrepancy may be related to the lower specific growth rates applied in the present study (0.025 hr −1 and below, while the cited earlier studies used 0.10 hr −1 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Elevated CO 2 (50%) did not, by itself, affect the biomass yield or viability of S. cerevisiae as compared to those under reference conditions (Table 1), and, accordingly, triggered only a weak transcriptional response ( Figure 5). This result appears to contradict results from two independent previous studies on the same strain, performed at CO 2 levels of 50% and 79%, under fully respiratory conditions (Aguilera et al, 2005;Eigenstetter & Takors, 2017;Richard et al, 2014). This apparent discrepancy may be related to the lower specific growth rates applied in the present study (0.025 hr −1 and below, while the cited earlier studies used 0.10 hr −1 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Production of the free acid prevents the need for coproduction of large quantities of gypsum (Abbott, Zelle, Pronk, & Van Maris, ; Chen & Nielsen, ). In contrast to most carboxylic‐acid producing prokaryotes, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can withstand both high CO 2 (Aguilera, Petit, De Winde, & Pronk, ; Eigenstetter & Takors, ; Richard, Guillouet, & Uribelarrea, ) and low pH (Della‐Bianca, de Hulster, Pronk, van Maris, & Gombert, ; Verduyn, Postma, Scheffers, & van Dijken, ). However, although S. cerevisiae grows at high CO 2 , reduced biomass yields have been reported for respiring S. cerevisiae cultures grown at CO 2 values of 50% and 79% (Aguilera et al, ; Eigenstetter & Takors, ; Richard et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon was in the focus of recent studies. Richard et al ( 2014 ) outlined that transient metabolic responses are triggered by CO 2 shifts e.g., characterized by intermediary increase of respiration rates and the excretion of ethanol and acetate.…”
Section: Co 2 Induced Growth Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the yeast needed to use CO 2 to synthesize pyrimidine, purine, and a variety of amino acids, the CO 2 generated by respiration in the reactors was adequate to be supplied during the whole fermentation process. Reversely, excessive CO 2 played a detrimental role in yeast growth in many cases . Selecting strong base sodium hydroxide as the pH regulator would directly damage yeast walls as well as break the balance of internal and external electric potential difference of yeast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%