1982
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198211000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the Relationship between Crossed and Uncrossed Acoustic Reflex Amplitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, amplitudes for IL responses were larger than for CL responses, and this was true for both left and right ears [Fig. ; see also Hall III, ]. For the autistic subjects, ASR amplitudes ranged from 0.02 to 0.23 mL, and we observed a similar trend that IL amplitudes were larger than those for CL responses (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Generally, amplitudes for IL responses were larger than for CL responses, and this was true for both left and right ears [Fig. ; see also Hall III, ]. For the autistic subjects, ASR amplitudes ranged from 0.02 to 0.23 mL, and we observed a similar trend that IL amplitudes were larger than those for CL responses (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…As has been shown in other studies, the ASR amplitude growth function for the BBN was shallower than that for the tonal stimulus activators [36,48,49,50]. The ipsilateral/contralateral amplitude growth ratios observed in this study were consistent with the response pattern seen in normal non-Pb exposed populations [50,51]. These findings suggest that the neurons activated in the ASR from the 8th nerve through the brainstem continued to increase in number and exhibited normal temporal and spatial processing as the intensity of the stimulus activators was increased.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Duration dependent slope differences that we observed in our MIFs have been previously reported for the crossed (Jerger et al, 1977;Lutman and Martin, 1977;Gelfand et al, 1981 ) and uncrossed reflex (M611er, 1962). Suprathreshold asymmetries in crossed and uncrossed reflex magnitude ha.ve also been reported for ear canal acoustic immittance measurements (e.g., M611er, 1961, 1962Borg and M611er, 1968;Jerger et al, 1978;Hall, 1982;Houghton et al, 1988 ) and for stapedius EMG activity (Guinan and McCue, 1987).…”
Section: B Suprathreshold Effectsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This effect has been shown in ear canal acoustic immittance studio• in humans (e.g. M611er, 1962; Tor,,or ,,t a!., 1978; Hall, 1982), as well as from EMG activity recorded directly from stapedius muscle in cats (Guinan and McCue, 1987).…”
Section: A Threshold Effectsmentioning
confidence: 57%