2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the Mutant CALR Allelic Burden by Digital PCR

Abstract: With the recent discovery of CALR mutations, >80% of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms carry a phenotype-driving mutation. For JAK2 V617F, the most frequent mutation in myeloproliferative neoplasms, accurate determination of mutational loads is of interest at diagnosis, for phenotypic and prognostic purposes, and during follow-up for minimal residual disease assessment. We developed a digital PCR technique that allowed the accurate determination of CALR allelic burdens for the main mutations (types 1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ddPCR was performed on a QX-100 Droplet Digital System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and the mutated allele burden was analysed by multiplex PCR assays for the CALR type 1 and type 2 mutations on 10–17.000 droplets. The assays and reactions were performed as previously described [ 29 ], with the following changes for the type 2 assay: primer concentrations were 300 nM and probe concentration was 200 nM while the annealing temperature was set to 60°C for both assays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ddPCR was performed on a QX-100 Droplet Digital System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and the mutated allele burden was analysed by multiplex PCR assays for the CALR type 1 and type 2 mutations on 10–17.000 droplets. The assays and reactions were performed as previously described [ 29 ], with the following changes for the type 2 assay: primer concentrations were 300 nM and probe concentration was 200 nM while the annealing temperature was set to 60°C for both assays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For routine diagnostic purposes, screening for CALR mutations by fragment analysis is sufficiently sensitive as the majority of CALR mutation positive samples appear to have above 15% mutant alleles [ 27 ]. However, post-transplantation relapse monitoring of CALR mutation positive AML patients and evaluation of treatment response in ET patients during IFN treatment have established the value of sensitive and quantitative determination of CALR mutations [ 22 , 23 , 28 , 29 ]. Sensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays are currently the method of choice for monitoring mutant allele burden including deep IFN-induced remissions as seen in a subset of JAK2- V617F positive MPN patients [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only in the last few years dPCR has been broadly introduced in molecular diagnostics in different areas of medicine [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. In hematology, several studies have indicated applicability of dPCR for the detection of minimal residual disease using a variety of molecular markers [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. As noted above, principal suitability of dPCR for analysis of hematopoietic chimerism after allogeneic SCT has also been shown [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Life technologies, Courtaboeuf, France), treated by DNAse (Ambion) and reverse-transcribed with First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France). CALR mRNA expression was assessed by digital droplets PCR (ddPCR) as previously described [49]. UPR target gene expression was evaluated by RT-qPCR as previously described [50].…”
Section: Rt-qpcr and Ddpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%