2007
DOI: 10.1021/es0707198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the Filterability of Freshwater Bacteria through 0.45, 0.22, and 0.1 μm Pore Size Filters and Shape-Dependent Enrichment of Filterable Bacterial Communities

Abstract: Micro-filtration is a standard process for sterilization in scientific research, medical, and industrial applications, and to remove particles in drinking water or wastewater treatment. It is generally assumed, and confirmed by quantifying filtration efficiency by plating, that filters with a 0.1-0.45 microm pore size can retain bacteria. In contrast to this assumption, we have regularly observed the passage of a significant fraction of natural freshwater bacterial communities through 0.45, 0.22, and 0.1 micro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
109
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(57 reference statements)
8
109
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of recent studies have demonstrated that some bacteria are able to pass through commonly used filters sizes (Wang et al 2007;Fedotova et al 2013). For the filter pore size used in this study for Experiment A, 0.45 µm, Wang et al (2007) demonstrated with lake water that on average 50% of total bacterial populations passed through the filter. It seems clear that for Experiment A to have assessed the effects of photo-degradation only, the samples needed to have been filtered through a much smaller pore size to ensure removal of cyanobateria.…”
Section: Susceptibility Of Contrasting Waters To Photo-degradationmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of recent studies have demonstrated that some bacteria are able to pass through commonly used filters sizes (Wang et al 2007;Fedotova et al 2013). For the filter pore size used in this study for Experiment A, 0.45 µm, Wang et al (2007) demonstrated with lake water that on average 50% of total bacterial populations passed through the filter. It seems clear that for Experiment A to have assessed the effects of photo-degradation only, the samples needed to have been filtered through a much smaller pore size to ensure removal of cyanobateria.…”
Section: Susceptibility Of Contrasting Waters To Photo-degradationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…It seems clear that for Experiment A to have assessed the effects of photo-degradation only, the samples needed to have been filtered through a much smaller pore size to ensure removal of cyanobateria. However, even a pore size of 0.1 µm could have allowed some bacteria through (Wang et al 2007), but would likely have excluded a significant part of the total DOC. The DOC increases observed in Experiment A must have been due to the incomplete removal of bacteria and their subsequent reproduction, although the exact mechanism responsible for the increase (exudation through growth or stress) remain unresolved.…”
Section: Susceptibility Of Contrasting Waters To Photo-degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only slight degradation of pure ATP in bottled water was observed from exposure to UVA light compared to dark controls (,12 %). This degradation (Wang et al, 2007); however, particularly in the initial phase of the experiments, the results were not affected by this slight degradation of ATP (see Methods). The ATP content of E. coli cells showed an initial transient increase to 110 % of the initial value and then dropped massively with increasing UVA fluence (Fig.…”
Section: Atp-generation Potential Of Cells When Adding Substrate Aftementioning
confidence: 86%
“…For example, FC was reported to be four times faster and more accurate (<5% standard deviation compared to >10% for EpiM) than EpiM ). Moreover, it is possible to directly count by FC when the concentrations of bacteria are as low as 10 3 -10 4 cells/mL, whereas EpiM requires sample concentration (Wang et al 2007;Hammes et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%