2012
DOI: 10.1299/jtst.7.351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the Existence Ratio of Non-Adhesion Grain Boundaries and Factors Governing the Strength of Coke Containing Low-Quality Coal

Abstract: Abstract"Non-adhesion grain boundaries" are formed when low-quality coal grains do not adhere to other grains in the carbonization process because of the low dilation of coke. To better understand the effects of non-adhesion grain boundaries on coke strength, the relationship between the existence ratio of non-adhesion grain boundaries and coke strength was investigated quantitatively. The existence ratio of non-adhesion grain boundaries were measured quantitatively by observing the fracture cross-section of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model predicts that the coke strength decreases linearly with an increase in the blending ratio of the lowquality coal. The coke strength measured by Kanai et al 6) also shows the same pattern as the one calculated in this study. Figure 10 shows the calculated fracture strength together with the experimental one.…”
Section: The Effect Of the Non-adhesion Grain Boundaries In The Coke supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model predicts that the coke strength decreases linearly with an increase in the blending ratio of the lowquality coal. The coke strength measured by Kanai et al 6) also shows the same pattern as the one calculated in this study. Figure 10 shows the calculated fracture strength together with the experimental one.…”
Section: The Effect Of the Non-adhesion Grain Boundaries In The Coke supporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the coke model had only one nonadhesion grain boundary, and the position of a non-adhesion grain boundary was fixed. The investigation in consideration of existence ratio of the non-adhesion grain boundaries such as Kanai et al 6) were not conducted. 7) Saito et al 8) performed fracture analysis for a model coke assuming a diametral compression test, and the springs of the nonadhesion grain boundaries with low fracture strength and low elastic modulus were randomly-placed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boundaries In the previous study, 8) it has been known that there are the pores, fractured coke matrices and non-adhesion grain boundaries on the fracture surface of coke from low-quality coal. Hayashizaki et al performed an image analysis for the polished surface of coke and the pores were extracted according to the difference in brightness because the pore had depth and its brightness was dark.…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluation Of Non-adhesion Grainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reasons mentioned above, nonadhesion grain boundaries would decrease the coke strength, and the necessity of quantification of non-adhesion grain boundaries has grown. Kanai et al 8) observed the fracture cross-section of coke by a diametral-compression test and extracted non-adhesion grain boundaries by visual assessment and then investigated the correlation between coke strength and non-adhesion grain boundaries. However, the marking method requires a huge effort, and the result of the method would be dependent on an observer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation