Quantification of the Benefits for Power System of Resilience Boosting Measures

Ciapessoni, Emanuele; Cirio, D.; Pitto, A.; Sforna, M.

doi:10.3390/app10165402

Cited by 12 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 22 publications

(40 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Electric utility experience throughout the pandemic has been captured, and a set of observed measures that have been taken by electric utilities is presented. In particular, the authors discuss how the CIGRE C4.47 definition for resilience [24] can be applied to the response of power system organisations to the pandemic, and the observed measures are categorised in accordance with the definition.…”

Section: Key Contributions and Outline Of The Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience of electric utilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in the framework of the CIGRE definition of Power System Resilience

Skarvelis‐Kazakos

Harte

Panteli

et al. 2022

International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Key Contributions and Outline Of The Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience of electric utilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in the framework of the CIGRE definition of Power System Resilience

Skarvelis‐Kazakos

Harte

Panteli

et al. 2022

International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…redundancies, component hardening) and active resilience measures (i.e. threat assessment, restoration procedures) [22]. The active resilience measures can be further classified into proactive (i.e.…”

Section: Time-basedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Time-based classification is the most common approach for resilience measures that distinguishes between power system planning and operation [21,22,23]. A similar classification approach can be achieved by defining passive (i.e.…”

Section: Time-basedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience of Digitalized Power Systems – Challenges and Solutions

Brand

Stark

Holly

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Power systems are undergoing a transition from centralized generation to distributed renewable generation. That calls for more flexibility in balancing generation and consumption because distributed energy resources in most cases rely on weather-dependent resources and can, therefore, only be controlled to a certain degree. The necessary flexibility can be achieved by introducing digitalization into the energy system. However, digitalization also leads to new vulnerabilities of the power system and increases its complexity. Additionally, the often rapid and unforeseeable development of information and communication technology introduces a new level of uncertainty in the system design. These circumstances make it necessary to shift from a classical design of robust to the design of resilient power systems that are able to anticipate, react to, and recover from them. In this paper, these real-time attributes of a resilient digitalized power system are analyzed with respect to potential measures: an enhanced situational awareness, virtualization, flexibilization, and a distributed blackstart. The measures tackle different challenges for resilient digitalized power systems and cover different phases of the resilience process, visualized in the so-called resilience bathtub curve. The implementation of these measures can increase the resilience of a digitalized power system and are meant to be combined with further, also non-real-time measures.

show abstract

“…The results are illustrated in Figure 7. According to the results, among the surveyed studies, energy systems (e.g., [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]), transportation networks (e.g., [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]), and water supply networks (e.g., [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]) have the highest frequency as case studies, among other fields. Meanwhile, health care infrastructures [79,80], industrial processes [81][82][83], supply chain [84], mining sector…”

Section: In What Type Of Technological Ciss Has the Concept Of Resilience Been Used?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nan and Sansavini [103] and the CIGRE C4 47. Power System Resilience Working Group define that resilience only relies on the CIS's ability to withstand a disruption (i.e., its robustness).• Some of the definitions (such as those of NIAC, NAS, and Hosseini and Barker[17]) indicate that absorption of the disruption's adverse impacts and adaptation to the new conditions are necessary for a CIS's resilience.•According to Yoon et al[8], Mostafavi[59], Faber et al[106], UNISDR, and IM-PROVER's definitions, a resilient CIS preserves its needed functionality after a disruptive event.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Risk management is a fundamental approach to improving critical infrastructure systems’ safety against disruptive events. This approach focuses on designing robust critical infrastructure systems (CISs) that could resist disruptive events by minimizing the possible events’ probability and consequences using preventive and protective programs. However, recent disasters like COVID-19 have shown that most CISs cannot stand against all potential disruptions. Recently there is a transition from robust design to resilience design of CISs, increasing the focus on preparedness, response, and recovery. Resilient CISs withstand most of the internal and external shocks, and if they fail, they can bounce back to the operational phase as soon as possible using minimum resources. Moreover, in resilient CISs, early warning enables managers to get timely information about the proximity and development of distributions. An understanding of the concept of resilience, its influential factors, and available evaluation and analyzing tools are required to have effective resilience management. Moreover, it is important to highlight the current gaps. Technological resilience is a new concept associated with some ambiguity around its definition, its terms, and its applications. Hence, using the concept of resilience without understanding these variations may lead to ineffective pre- and post-disruption planning. A well-established systematic literature review can provide a deep understanding regarding the concept of resilience, its limitation, and applications. The aim of this paper is to conduct a systematic literature review to study the current research around technological CISs’ resilience. In the review, 192 primary studies published between 2003 and 2020 are reviewed. Based on the results, the concept of resilience has gradually found its place among researchers since 2003, and the number of related studies has grown significantly. It emerges from the review that a CIS can be considered as resilient if it has (i) the ability to imagine what to expect, (ii) the ability to protect and resist a disruption, (iii) the ability to absorb the adverse effects of disruption, (iv) the ability to adapt to new conditions and changes caused by disruption, and (v) the ability to recover the CIS’s normal performance level after a disruption. It was shown that robustness is the most frequent resilience contributing factor among the reviewed primary studies. Resilience analysis approaches can be classified into four main groups: empirical, simulation, index-based, and qualitative approaches. Simulation approaches, as dominant models, mostly study real case studies, while empirical methods, specifically those that are deterministic, are built based on many assumptions that are difficult to justify in many cases.

show abstract

Quantification of the Benefits for Power System of Resilience Boosting Measures

Cited by 12 publications

References 22 publications

Resilience of electric utilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in the framework of the CIGRE definition of Power System Resilience

Resilience of electric utilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in the framework of the CIGRE definition of Power System Resilience

Resilience of Digitalized Power Systems – Challenges and Solutions

The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About