2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00703-021-00815-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the aerosol-induced errors in solar irradiance modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very few studies focus on the aerosol impact on the separation of clear-sky global solar irradiance into its primary components direct-normal and diffuse. In a recent study, the classical diffuse fraction was explored as an appropriate quantifier for the fractional part of the global solar irradiance estimated by a clear-sky solar irradiance model as being diffuse [14]. This work continues the study [14], revealing new capabilities of the clear-sky diffuse fraction as a quantifier of the aerosol impact on the global solar irradiance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Very few studies focus on the aerosol impact on the separation of clear-sky global solar irradiance into its primary components direct-normal and diffuse. In a recent study, the classical diffuse fraction was explored as an appropriate quantifier for the fractional part of the global solar irradiance estimated by a clear-sky solar irradiance model as being diffuse [14]. This work continues the study [14], revealing new capabilities of the clear-sky diffuse fraction as a quantifier of the aerosol impact on the global solar irradiance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In Ref. [14] the estimation errors are separated into two classes: (A) intrinsic/general model errors and (B) aerosolrelated errors. The aerosol-related errors may be further divided into two sub-classes: (B1) the inability of the solar irradiance model in capturing the aerosol influence on the atmospheric transmittance and (B2) the uncertainty in the input parameters associated with aerosols.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M1 is the result of intensive research on the effect of various predictors on the diffuse fraction. It gathers together almost all the predictors successfully accounted for by the previous separation models: (1) the clearness index k t , (2) the deviation of the clearness index from its estimated value under clear skies ∆k tc , (defined by Equation (A3)), (3) the part of diffuse fraction k d that is attributable to cloud enhancement k de , (defined by Equation (A4)), (4) daily average of the clearness index k day , (defined by Equation (A1)), (5) hourly average of the clearness index k hour , (6) the persistence factor ψ, defined as the average of a lag and a lead of the clearness index values, (7) the clear sky global solar irradiance G cs in MJ/(h•m 2 ), and (8) the ratio of measured GHI and the estimated global clear sky irradiance K csi . M1 is defined by the empirical equation (R 2 = 0.929 and nMBE = 0.011):…”
Section: A Proposal For Minute-scale Ghi Separation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with this basic application, the evaluation of DHI and DNI on the basis of GHI, which is currently the diffuse fraction, acquires new values, such as its use as a quantifier of the uncertainty induced by aerosols in estimating clear-sky DHI [7] or as a proxy for classifying the sky conditions into clear, intermediate, and overcast [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The REST2 model is universally recognized as one of the most accurate models available in the literature [13], and a model which maintains a good performance under all atmospheric conditions [14]. The v5 version of REST2 is used here as a reference model 100 [15].…”
Section: Clear-sky Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%