1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199707)19:4<281::aid-hed6>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of surgical margin shrinkage in the oral cavity

Robert E. Johnson,
June D. Sigman,
Gerry F. Funk
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
124
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
7
124
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the first reference regarding to the study of tissue shrinkage on surgical margins of resection in oral cavity and oropharynx is attributed to Johnson et al [9] in 1997. In their experimental study on ten mongrel dogs they reported that a shrink of up to 30-50% may be expected in the specimens of oral cavity and oropharynx and the maximum shrinkage occurs immediately after the resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the first reference regarding to the study of tissue shrinkage on surgical margins of resection in oral cavity and oropharynx is attributed to Johnson et al [9] in 1997. In their experimental study on ten mongrel dogs they reported that a shrink of up to 30-50% may be expected in the specimens of oral cavity and oropharynx and the maximum shrinkage occurs immediately after the resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] However, although one goal in the oncologic surgery is the complete removal of the tumor with an appropriate margin of security and less aesthetic and functional impact; in the head and neck region, due to its three-dimensional characteristics and the presence of noble structures, the obtaining of appropriate limits of resection constitutes, on occasions, a real challenge for the surgeon. [9,10] Nevertheless, since 1978 when Looser et al [5] defined the term "positive surgical margin", diverse concepts such as "close margins", "involved margins" or "clear margins", among others, have been introduced in the literature without a general consensus. [10][11][12][13] In fact, even today, there are no universal guidelines that permit different pathologists to adopt the same histologic criteria regarding to surgical margin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that there may be a 20% to 47% shrinkage in tumor margins after a pathologic fixation procedure, especially for small tumors. 55,56 Therefore, it seems to not be practical to use the depth of tumor invasion or other pathologic parameters as a guideline to determine whether the patient should receive END or not. It will become 2 stages of surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies are reported in literature about the effect of thermal tissue injury in head and neck area, and the vast majority of them are based on animal or cadaveric models [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]; here, a laryngeal model, created using excised larynges, was developed to quantify the effect of thermal injury of different devices on laryngeal normal mucosa and to predict their effect on margins status and final histopathological report.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%