2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Saharan and local dust impact in an arid Mediterranean area by the positive matrix factorization (PMF) technique

Abstract: a b s t r a c tParticle composition data for PM 10 samples collected at an urban background location in Elche in southeastern Spain from December 2004 to November 2005 were analysed to provide source identification and apportionment. A total of 120 samples were collected and analysed by Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) and ion chromatography. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) was used to estimate sources profiles and their mass contributions. The PMF modelling identified six sources: PM 10 mass was app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive matrix factorization (PMF) is a new model based on a weighted non-negative least squares algorithm which overcomes this problem as it beforehand restricts the mentioned values in such a way that only positive values are allowed; moreover, experimental concentrations are weighted using their uncertainties. PMF has already been applied in numerous studies (Polissar et al 1998;Kim et al 2004;Kim and Hopke 2004b;Begum et al 2004;Nicolás et al 2008). The disadvantages of PCA (or FA) and advantages of advanced receptor models like PMF have been compared in different studies (e.g., Qin et al 2002;Viana et al 2008;Tauler et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive matrix factorization (PMF) is a new model based on a weighted non-negative least squares algorithm which overcomes this problem as it beforehand restricts the mentioned values in such a way that only positive values are allowed; moreover, experimental concentrations are weighted using their uncertainties. PMF has already been applied in numerous studies (Polissar et al 1998;Kim et al 2004;Kim and Hopke 2004b;Begum et al 2004;Nicolás et al 2008). The disadvantages of PCA (or FA) and advantages of advanced receptor models like PMF have been compared in different studies (e.g., Qin et al 2002;Viana et al 2008;Tauler et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the contribution of fly ash to PM 10 is negligible (Gaffney and Marley, 2009) and Si, Al, and Fe elements are commonly used to identify and quantify the crustal content, particularly in the Mediterranean region (e.g. Remoundaki et al, 2011;Koçak et al, 2007;Nicolás et al, 2008).…”
Section: And Ni Enrichment With Respect To Crustal Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goodness of model fit parameter 'Q' was evaluated to identify the optimal number of factors, and the optimal solution should lie in this FPEAK range. However, in the current study, a subset of species was used for the analysis, and thus the measured PM 10 , PM 2.5 and PM 0.1 concentrations were included in the PMF runs as an independent variable to obtain mass apportionment without the usual multiple linear regression analysis (Nicolas et al, 2008). The mass fraction distribution of species was used to identify the sources, which included soil dust, vehicle emissions, sea salt, industrial emissions and secondary aerosols.…”
Section: Source Apportionmentmentioning
confidence: 99%