1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(99)00115-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of profilins by a monoclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was very surprising to see that although the mice were boosted with rPru p 3, the reactions to the antibodies were greater with nPru p3. A very similar phenomenon also has been reported when quantifying peach profilin, demonstrating that the use of a recombinant protein isoform as standard might overestimate the profilin content of samples (Asturias et al 1999). One explanation may be that recombinant proteins are not correctly folded as natural Pru p 3, and also lack of natural ligands, such as lipids which may affect affinity (Bublin et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was very surprising to see that although the mice were boosted with rPru p 3, the reactions to the antibodies were greater with nPru p3. A very similar phenomenon also has been reported when quantifying peach profilin, demonstrating that the use of a recombinant protein isoform as standard might overestimate the profilin content of samples (Asturias et al 1999). One explanation may be that recombinant proteins are not correctly folded as natural Pru p 3, and also lack of natural ligands, such as lipids which may affect affinity (Bublin et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The latter is the most common type of immunoassay for detecting potential food allergens and has been developed for several of them, with numerous test kits made commercially available in this format during the last decade. Sandwich ELISA has been used to quantify the peach allergen (Asturias et al 1999;Ahrazem et al 2007). In most sandwich ELISAs, a monoclonal antibody is usually used as the first antibody and a polyclonal as the detection antibody (Carnes et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, histamine release curves with purified profilins and orange extract had almost identical shapes, indicating that the whole allergenic potency of the extract was represented by profilin. Concentration differences between extract and purified protein are due to the fact that profilin represents a minor protein constituent in plants, for example, 0.015 to 0.02% of total protein in various pollens [34]. Therefore, we conclude that it is very likely that Cit s 2 has the potential to trigger clinical symptoms in orange allergy while at the same time cross-reactivity not correlated with clinical food allergy is also common and may reflect low affinity binding to orange profilin of IgE from subjects sensitized to profilins from various pollen sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RANTES and TGF-␤1 in culture supernatants, serum, and SF were measured by sandwich ELISA, as described [20]. Briefly, a 4 g/ml solution of monoclonal antibodies to human RANTES and TGF-␤1 (R&D Systems) was added to a 96-well plate (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) and incubated overnight at 4 • C. After incubating the plate with blocking solution (phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% Tween 20) for 2 h at room temperature, test samples and the standard recombinant cytokines (R&D Systems) were added, and the plate was incubated at room temperature for 2 h. After washing four times with PBS containing Tween 20, 500 ng/ml of biotinylated monoclonal antibodies to human RANTES and TGF-␤1 (R&D Systems) was added, and the reactions were allowed to proceed for 2 h at room temperature.…”
Section: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (Elisa) Of Rantes and Tgf-β1mentioning
confidence: 99%