2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-016-0216-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of postural stability in minimally disabled multiple sclerosis patients by means of dynamic posturography: an observational study

Abstract: BackgroundMultiple Sclerosis (MS) is a widespread progressive neurologic disease with consequent impairments in daily activities. Disorders of balance are frequent and equilibrium tests are potentially useful to quantify disability and to verify treatment effectiveness. The fair sensitivity of the widely used not-perturbed tests to detect balance disturbances in MS patients have prompted the development of mechatronic systems capable to impose known equilibrium perturbations, in order to challenge the balance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 8 , 9 , 11 , 14 , 15 Some reliability studies have shown that posturographic protocols have good relative consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.62–0.93), allowing a proper classification of pwMS according to their postural control level. 7 , 16 , 17 However, the samples of pwMS in these studies were very heterogeneous (as participants showed a broad range of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores) that, owing to ICC sensitivity to sample heterogeneity, 18 could have artificially increased the relative reliability of these protocols and thus facilitated the classification of the patients. Moreover, to the authors’ best knowledge, there are no studies that have assessed the absolute reliability of the posturographic protocols (i.e., trial-to-trial variation); therefore, their ability to discriminate between clinically relevant changes in postural control (caused by the disease progression) and normal day-to-day variability remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 , 9 , 11 , 14 , 15 Some reliability studies have shown that posturographic protocols have good relative consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.62–0.93), allowing a proper classification of pwMS according to their postural control level. 7 , 16 , 17 However, the samples of pwMS in these studies were very heterogeneous (as participants showed a broad range of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores) that, owing to ICC sensitivity to sample heterogeneity, 18 could have artificially increased the relative reliability of these protocols and thus facilitated the classification of the patients. Moreover, to the authors’ best knowledge, there are no studies that have assessed the absolute reliability of the posturographic protocols (i.e., trial-to-trial variation); therefore, their ability to discriminate between clinically relevant changes in postural control (caused by the disease progression) and normal day-to-day variability remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluated point can be assumed as the center of pressure (COP); then, the antero-posterior (AP) and the medio-lateral components (ML) of the COP were computed. Finally, as stability indices we computed parameters that are typical considered in posturographic analysis [40][41][42]. Specifically, the path length (PL), the ellipse area (EA) and the mean frequency (FREQ) were evaluated by following the equations reported in Reference [41].…”
Section: Body Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all the above-mentioned parameters, the Romberg Index (RI) was also computed as the ratio between the stability parameters obtained during the EC and EO conditions [40]. Values of RI close to 1 indicate a better adaptation to the closed eyes condition.…”
Section: Body Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each trial lasted 30 seconds. Five key parameters are measured [30] : 1 [31] . COP is the point of application of forces exchanged between feet and ground.…”
Section: Balance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%