2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of nitrogen concentration in perennial ryegrass and red fescue using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) and chemometrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
37
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Using three different application rates of urine (0, 300, and 700 kg N ha −1 ) on soil from the same area as the present study Moir and colleagues (Moir, Edwards, et al 2012;Moir, Malcolm, et al 2012) recorded comparable mean N concentrations in ryegrass of 2.65-4.55%. Similarly, in extensive field trials of L. perenne and Festuca rubra in Denmark, Gislum et al (2004) reported a range of 0.6 to 6.26% N (mean value 2.81%). Clearly, luxury uptake of N is not characteristic of native plants.…”
Section: Nursery-plant Foliagementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Using three different application rates of urine (0, 300, and 700 kg N ha −1 ) on soil from the same area as the present study Moir and colleagues (Moir, Edwards, et al 2012;Moir, Malcolm, et al 2012) recorded comparable mean N concentrations in ryegrass of 2.65-4.55%. Similarly, in extensive field trials of L. perenne and Festuca rubra in Denmark, Gislum et al (2004) reported a range of 0.6 to 6.26% N (mean value 2.81%). Clearly, luxury uptake of N is not characteristic of native plants.…”
Section: Nursery-plant Foliagementioning
confidence: 92%
“…PLSR is a powerful method commonly used to develop calibration equations for predicting the variables of interest for a sample from NIR spectral data (Richardson et al 2003). The advantages of PLSR are that not only all NIR spectral data are included in the calibration Equations (Gislum et al 2004), but also variance of the data is extracted and related to the predicted variables (Richardson et al 2003). In small samples, cross-validation offers slightly superior predictive performance than external test validations (Martens & Dardenne 1998;Moron & Cozzolino 2004).…”
Section: Prediction Of Fine Root Proportions (Hypothesis 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some factors such as growing season and growing location result in different environmental factors that may affect the composition of the samples and decrease the accuracy of the calibrations. These influences are well known in the case of grass mixtures where the composition of samples may change from one season to another depending on the percentage of each grass (García Ciudad et al, 1999;Gislum et al, 2004). In the case of grains, it has been also observed an influence of the environmental conditions on the developing of NIRS calibrations in triticale (Igne et al, 2007) and mustard (Velasco et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%