“…There is a good correlation between ASL CBF and the gold standard of 15 O-PET in both resting state and activation studies (Feng et al, 2004; Kilroy et al, 2013; Ye et al, 2000). Besides providing a robust mean CBF averaged across a few minute scan, it has been shown to be feasible to perform dynamic FC analysis of the ASL perfusion image series (Chuang et al, 2008; Dai et al, 2013; Jann et al, 2013; Liang et al, 2012; Zou et al, 2009), similar to BOLD FC analysis. To date, however, very few studies have systematically addressed the similarity of RBNs detected using BOLD and ASL contrasts, as well as their reliability across sessions and scanners.…”