2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of microstructural features in α/β titanium alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high strength of the EBM material is likely due to it's refined lamellar microstructure with colony sizes on the order of 10 μm compared to 20 to 500 μm [3,4,6] for conventionally manufactured lamellar microstructures. The difference in strength between lots 1 and 2 can only be explained by the difference in texture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high strength of the EBM material is likely due to it's refined lamellar microstructure with colony sizes on the order of 10 μm compared to 20 to 500 μm [3,4,6] for conventionally manufactured lamellar microstructures. The difference in strength between lots 1 and 2 can only be explained by the difference in texture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these measured parameters are labelled as * in Tables 1-3. α grain size was measured by linear intercept method [34], and α lamellar width was measured by the way described in [35]. Fatigue strength data were obtained from the stress-life (S-N) curves in the literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of a lamellae in the samples produced with the profiled roller was measured using five scanning electron microscope (SEM) images according to the method explained in Tiley et al [13] Each image corresponded to a specific location within a generic band, as described in Martina et al [2] Prior to the SEM investigation, the samples were re-polished for eight minutes at 100 kg/m 2 and 80 rpm. SEM images were taken using a backscatter detector, a voltage of 20 keV, and a spot size of four (Figure 2(a)).…”
Section: A Evaluation Of Strain and Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was repeated for four directions (0, 45, 90, and 135 deg orientations) giving 20 measurements per location (Figure 2(d)), in accordance with ASTM E1382, [15] to take into account the strong anisotropy of the microstructure. The length of the intercepts across each line was determined using the ImageJ software [16] and its plugin Measure Roi PA. [17] Finally, the a lamellae thickness was determined as 1 = 1:5ð1=kÞ mean [13] where k mean is the mean intercept length.…”
Section: A Evaluation Of Strain and Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%