2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of liver fat content with ultrasonographic attenuation measurement function: Correlation with unenhanced multidimensional computerized tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies indicated that, when comparing the measurement results of protondensity fat fraction based on magnetic resonance imaging with CAP assessment results based on TE, the former is more effective than CAP in evaluating liver steatosis [20][21][22]. Notably, ATI had a similar diagnostic mechanism in this study [23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Recent studies indicated that, when comparing the measurement results of protondensity fat fraction based on magnetic resonance imaging with CAP assessment results based on TE, the former is more effective than CAP in evaluating liver steatosis [20][21][22]. Notably, ATI had a similar diagnostic mechanism in this study [23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Despite the paucity of data, the diagnostic performance of ATT and ATI for different steatosis grades is satisfactory. [ 20 , 21 ] Based on RF raw data in QUS, one can obtain and analyze a number of ultrasonic features. A novel machine learning score, QUS score that includes 18 predictive RF features, was developed from a biopsy-proven NAFLD cohort to detect NASH.…”
Section: Non-invasive Assessment Of Hepatic Steatosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these methods, CAP has been already widely used in clinical practice (see the next section). Despite the paucity of data, the diagnostic performance of ATT and ATI for different steatosis grades is satisfactory [20,21] . Based on RF raw data in QUS, one can obtain and analyze a number of ultrasonic features.…”
Section: Non-invasive Assessment Of Hepatic Steatosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding AUROC was 0.93. The ICC for the interobserver variability of ATT was 0.91 (Cerit et al 2020).…”
Section: Ati Technology (Canon Medical Systems Japan)mentioning
confidence: 94%