2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of lithium in LIB electrodes with glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy (GD-OES)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others used approaches different from direct calibration of GD-OES, such as elemental ratios and comparison to ICP results. ,, A direct GD-OES calibration was recently done by Ghanbari et al for Li which was in good agreement with ICP-OES results . However, for Si quantification via ICP measurements, hazardous conditions (HF) are necessary to dissolve Si.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others used approaches different from direct calibration of GD-OES, such as elemental ratios and comparison to ICP results. ,, A direct GD-OES calibration was recently done by Ghanbari et al for Li which was in good agreement with ICP-OES results . However, for Si quantification via ICP measurements, hazardous conditions (HF) are necessary to dissolve Si.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is possible to detect a wide range of concentrations simultaneously, as well as a semi-quantitative evaluation without the need for standardized matrices. [43][44][45] Nonetheless, the loss of lithium was already reported extensively in the literature, while the origin is still not fully claried. Here, the use of isotope-labeled materials would help to better understand these losses and tailor future LIB for their needed desires.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reports have also described that rf-GD-OES is applicable for the analysis of carbon-based negative electrodes. 6,7 The hard carbon electrodes (30 mm active layer) were measured up to the Cu current collector. However, the measurements took a long time, 5000-8000 s, in contrast with 2000-3000 s for positive electrodes (30 mm active layer) because of a low sputtering yield of carbon (0.12 atoms per ion compared to 1.0 for Fe, at 400 eV Ar ions 8 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%