2010
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429x-12-32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of left ventricular remodeling in response to isolated aortic or mitral regurgitation

Abstract: BackgroundThe treatment of patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) or mitral regurgitation (MR) relies on the accurate assessment of the severity of the regurgitation as well as its effect on left ventricular (LV) size and function. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is an excellent tool for quantifying regurgitant volumes as well as LV size and function. The 2008 AHA/ACC management guidelines for the therapy of patients with AR or MR only describe LV size in terms of linear dimensions (i.e. end-diastolic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
44
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that LVEDV may partly be a function of the quantity of regurgitation (supported by the strong association of LVEDV with mitral regurgitant volume). 20 This would be logical given that regurgitation is the physiological stimulus for LV dilation in this patient group, although this is not conclusively proven with our data, and the fact that several subjects with higher Values are mean±SD. Note that statistical comparisons are not made between groups because the time-dependent nature of the allocation to the conservative and crossover groups would make this inappropriate.…”
Section: Comparison With LV and Rv Volumetric Indexescontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…This suggests that LVEDV may partly be a function of the quantity of regurgitation (supported by the strong association of LVEDV with mitral regurgitant volume). 20 This would be logical given that regurgitation is the physiological stimulus for LV dilation in this patient group, although this is not conclusively proven with our data, and the fact that several subjects with higher Values are mean±SD. Note that statistical comparisons are not made between groups because the time-dependent nature of the allocation to the conservative and crossover groups would make this inappropriate.…”
Section: Comparison With LV and Rv Volumetric Indexescontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…[13][14][15][16] Compared with the evaluation of AR by echocardiography, MRI is more sensitive in patients with paravalvular, eccentric, or multiple jets like those frequently observed after TAVI. 17 We therefore sought to evaluate LV function, LV remodeling, and the occurrence and evolution of AR in the early and medium-term follow-up after TAVI by using serial cardiac MRI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac output in a regurgitant heart depends on regurgitant volume [2], an indicator of the severity of regurgitation. While research has focused on determining regurgitant volume using medical imaging techniques [3, 4], the effect of regurgitant volume on ventricular mechanical function has not been previously established. Understanding the changes in ventricular wall mechanics resulting from volume overload or underload caused by valvular regurgitation is of major clinical significance because it will allow the researchers to obtain a complete picture of the mechanisms that underlie ventricular remodeling and the progression of heart failure (HF) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%